Forgive me for asking a rather silly question, but I have thinking about the following definition of the extrinsic curvature ##\mathcal{K}_{ij}## of a sub-manifold (say, a boundary ##\partial M## of a manifold ##M##):(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

$$\mathcal{K}_{ij} \equiv \frac{1}{2}\mathcal{L}_{n}h_{ij} = \nabla_{(i}n_{j)},$$

where ##n## is the inward-pointing unit normal to ##\partial M## and ##h_{ij}## is the induced metric on ##\partial M##.

Is there an intuitive way to understand why the above must be the definition of the extrinsic curvature of a submanifold?

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# A Intution behind the definition of extrinsic curvature

Have something to add?

Draft saved
Draft deleted

Loading...

Similar Threads - Intution behind definition | Date |
---|---|

I Basic Q about Vector/tensor definition and velocity | Feb 24, 2018 |

I Definition of tangent space: why germs? | Oct 2, 2017 |

Logic behind definition of Reparametrization | Aug 18, 2015 |

Intuition behind two manifolds being the same. | Aug 25, 2013 |

Intuition behind compactness | Jul 30, 2009 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**