What is the set f(A) for the function f(x,y) = (x^2 - y^2, 2xy)?

  • Thread starter Thread starter JG89
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function Set
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves the function f(x,y) = (x^2 - y^2, 2xy) defined on the open set A = { (x,y) ∈ ℝ² : x > 0 }. The question seeks to determine the set f(A).

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the representation of f(A) using set notation and explore the implications of mapping the half-plane x > 0 under the function. Some consider using polar coordinates to express the transformation.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of the relationship between the original coordinates and the transformed coordinates. Some participants express uncertainty about their understanding of polar coordinates and complex variables, while others suggest that the mapping results in all points where r > 0 and -π < θ < π, indicating a broader interpretation of f(A).

Contextual Notes

Participants note the complexity of the problem and the potential for misunderstanding in the application of polar coordinates and complex variables. There is also mention of the need to clarify assumptions regarding the mapping and its implications for the resulting set.

JG89
Messages
724
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Let [tex]f(x,y) = (x^2 - y^2, 2xy)[/tex] where f is defined on the open set [tex]A = \{ (x,y) \in \mathbb{R}^2 : x > 0 \}[/tex].

What is the set f(A)?



Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution




I'm guessing they're asking me to describe f(A) using set notation. But I don't know how to do this. I've tried plotting a set of points to get an idea what f(A) would look like on the plane, but I can't get any idea whatsoever.

Any help or ideas?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you think of (x,y) as the complex variable z=x+iy, then it's the image of the half plane x>0 under mapping f(z)=z^2. Think about expressing it in polar form.
 
Look at below post...
 
Dick, I'm not too familiar with polar coordinates so please bear with me.

We can write, [tex]f(z) = (x + iy)^2 = (x^2 - y^2) + i(2xy)[/tex]. Using polar coordinates, we have [tex]r = \sqrt{ (x^2 - y^2)^2 + (2xy)^2 } = \sqrt{ x^4 - 2x^2 y^2 + y^4 + 4x^2y^2} = \sqrt{ x^4 + 2x^2y^2 + y^4} = \sqrt{(x^2 + y^2)^2} = x^2 + y^2.[/tex]

So, we can write [tex]f(z) = (x^2 - y^2) + i(2xy) = (r^2 - 2y^2) + i(2xy)[/tex]. Since [tex]x = r cos(t), y = r sin(t)[/tex] then [tex]f(z) = (r^2 - 2y^2) + i(2xy) = r^2 - 2r^2 sin^2 (t) + i(2r^2sin(t) cos(t)) = r^2 [ 1 - 2sin^2 (t) + i (2 sin(t) cos(t))] = r^2[ cos(2t) + i(sin(2t)][/tex]. I used a bunch of trig identities for that...

Anyway, so we see that [tex]f(z) = f(x + iy) = f( r[cos(t) + isin(t)]) = r^2[ cos(2t) + i sin(2t)][/tex].

So the distance from the origin to the point f(z) is r^2 (whereas the distance from the origin to the point z is r) and the polar-angle is 2t, twice the original angle. Now I have a better idea of how f(A) would look on the plane, but I still don't know how to express it with set notation, or in a way that seems appropriate to answer the question.
 
You are making this way too complicated. And it's also wrong. z=x+iy, r=sqrt(x^2+y^2). If x>0 then z=r*exp(i*theta) where theta is in (-pi/2,pi/2), right? You do know something about complex variables, yes? I was hoping so.
 
Last edited:
Ok, so [tex]f(z) = f(r e^{i \theta}) = (r e^{i \theta})^2 = r^2 e^{i(2 \theta)}[/tex]

I still don't see anything...

EDIT: I know a bit, but maybe not enough for this question, as I think I might have made an exponent mistake just now because of the complex variables [/tex]
 
It's simpler than you think. You were setting r equal to |f(z)|. r should be |z| to use the expression you are suggesting. Do you agree -pi/2<theta<pi/2?
 
f(z) = r^2 exp(i*2*theta) = r^2[ cos(2*theta) + i sin(2*theta) ].

Again it just seems to me that the distance from the origin to f(z) is the square of the distance from the origin to z, and that the angle between the positive x-axis and f(z) is double the angle from the positive x-axis to z. Just the same stuff I said before...

Maybe I need to catch some sleep then think about it in the morning, or am I onto something?...EDIT: Yes, I agree that -pi/2 < theta < pi/2, which would mean that -pi < 2*theta < pi...
 
JG89 said:
f(z) = r^2 exp(i*2*theta) = r^2[ cos(2*theta) + i sin(2*theta) ].

Again it just seems to me that the distance from the origin to f(z) is the square of the distance from the origin to z, and that the angle between the positive x-axis and f(z) is double the angle from the positive x-axis to z. Just the same stuff I said before...

Maybe I need to catch some sleep then think about it in the morning, or am I onto something?...


EDIT: Yes, I agree that -pi/2 < theta < pi/2, which would mean that -pi < 2*theta < pi...

Yeah, you are just picturing this wrong somehow. f(A) is ALL points where r>0 and -pi<theta<pi. ALL of them. f(A) isn't some kind of curve.
 
  • #10
So f(A) is just the plane, minus the origin and the negative x-axis?
 
  • #11
JG89 said:
So f(A) is just the plane, minus the origin and the negative x-axis?

That's my conclusion.
 
  • #12
Ahhh, I see it now. Thanks for the help. I have a similar question just with a different map, so I'm going to go work on that now. I should be fine with it :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
Replies
20
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K