What is the Significance of the Planck Length-to-Mass Ratio in Quantum Physics?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the significance of the Planck length-to-mass ratio in quantum physics, specifically highlighting the formulas for Planck length and Planck mass. The Planck length is defined as \(\ell_P = \sqrt{\frac{\hbar G}{c^3}}\) and the Planck mass as \(m_P = \sqrt{\frac{\hbar c}{G}}\). The ratio of Planck length to Planck mass simplifies to \(G/c^2\), indicating that \(\hbar\) does not factor into quantum relationships. The conversation also addresses a common misconception regarding the equations presented.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics concepts
  • Familiarity with fundamental constants: \(\hbar\), \(G\), and \(c\)
  • Basic knowledge of dimensional analysis in physics
  • Ability to interpret mathematical equations in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of the Planck length in quantum gravity theories
  • Explore the role of Planck units in theoretical physics
  • Study the relationship between quantum mechanics and general relativity
  • Investigate the significance of the Planck mass in particle physics
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of quantum mechanics, and researchers interested in the foundational aspects of quantum theory and its relationship to gravity.

delplace
Messages
64
Reaction score
0
does anyone know something about the ratio of Planck length to Planck mass : signification, use in quantum relationships...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The Planck length is: \sqrt{\frac{\hbar G}{c^3}}

and the Planck mass is: \sqrt{\frac{\hbar c}{G}}

The ratio is therefore G/c^{2}. Since there is no \hbar, it will not appear in "quantum relationships".
 
Last edited:
Is this post also just for "testing us"? To see if we are worth your time?
 

Vanadium_50 said:
The Planck length is: \sqrt{\frac{\hbar G}{c^2}}

Negative, that equation is incorrect.

Planck length:
\ell_P = \sqrt\frac{\hbar G}{c^3}
[/Color]
Reference:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planck_length"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Typo fixed. The point that hbar divides out, though, is unaffected.
 
At least nobody is asking for Planck length divided by Planck time ...:biggrin:
 
Last edited:
Planck colour divided by Planck field then? :biggrin:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
857
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K