What is the Solution to the One-Dimensional Particle in an Energy Well Problem?

  • Thread starter Thread starter TFM
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy Particle
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a one-dimensional particle confined in a potential well, specifically addressing the stationary Schrödinger equation and its solutions. Participants explore the normalization of wave functions, energy eigenvalues, and the time-dependent wave function for the nth stationary state.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the normalization of wave functions and the derivation of energy eigenvalues. There is an exploration of the Hamiltonian operator and its relationship to the energy eigenvalues. Questions arise regarding the correct form of the momentum operator and the implications of the Schrödinger equation.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing insights and corrections to each other's reasoning. Some guidance has been offered regarding the relationship between the Hamiltonian operator and energy eigenvalues, as well as the structure of the time-dependent wave function.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working within the constraints of a homework assignment, which may impose specific requirements for the solutions and interpretations of the equations involved. There are indications of confusion regarding signs in equations and the proper formulation of the time-dependent factor.

  • #31
Sure. So phi*=phi.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
okay so:


\phi = \phi^* = Asin(\frac{n\pi}{L}x)

Asin(\frac{n\pi}{L}x)*Asin(\frac{n\pi}{L}x) = 1

= A^2 sin^2(\frac{n\pi}{L}x) = 1

= A^2 = \frac{1}{sin^2(\frac{n\pi}{L}x)}

= A = \sqrt{\frac{1}{sin^2(\frac{n\pi}{L}x)}}

This doesn't seem right to me though...?
 
  • #33
Integrate. Integrate. Integrate. I've mentioned that several times. Look up the definition of <> and normalization. You have to integrate x from 0 to L on the third line.
 
  • #34
Sorry, so:

\int{\phi^* \phi}dx = 1

so:

\int{Asin(\frac{n\pi}{L}x)*Asin(\frac{n\pi}{L}x)} dx = 1

A^2\int{sin(\frac{n\pi}{L}x)*sin(\frac{n\pi}{L}x)} dx = 1

A^2\int{sin^2(\frac{n\pi}{L}x)dx = 1

A^2[\frac{n\pi}{2L}x - \frac{n\pi}{4L}sin(\frac{2n\pi}{L}x)]^L_0 = 1

A^2[\frac{n\pi}{2L}0 - \frac{n\pi}{4L}sin(\frac{2n\pi}{L}(0)) - \frac{n\pi}{2L}(L) - \frac{n\pi}{4L}sin(\frac{2n\pi}{L}L)] = 1

A^2[(\frac{n\pi}{2}] = 1

A^2 n\pi = 2

A^2 = \frac{2}{n\pi}

A = \sqrt{\frac{2}{n\pi}}

Does tgis look better?
 
  • #35
Well, I get the integral to be L/2. No pi's, no n's. Better check the integration. Use sin^2(kx)=(1-cos(2kx))/2. The cos part doesn't contribute anything. It averages out. How did you get all those n*pi/L parts outside?
 
Last edited:
  • #36
Okay, so:

A^2\int{sin^2(\frac{n\pi}{L}x)dx = 1

Using:

sin^2 (kx) = \frac{1}{2} - \frac{cos(kx)}{2}

Gives:

A^2\int{\frac{1}{2} - \frac{cos(kx)}{2}}dx = 1

A^2[{\frac{x}{2} - \frac{k}{2} sin(kx)}]^L_0 = 1

A^2[{\frac{L}{2} - \frac{k}{2} sin(kL)}] = 1

k = n\pi/L

A^2[{\frac{L}{2} - \frac{n\pi}{2} sin(n\pi)}] = 1

sin of n*pi = 0

A^2[{\frac{L}{2}] = 1

A^2{\frac{L}{2} = 1

A^2 = {\frac{2}{L}

gives A to be:

A = \sqrt{\frac{2}{L}}

Is this better now?
 
Last edited:
  • #37
OKay, I have looked in the book and it does appear to be the right answer - should I have done this part in the previous section?

So: \sqrt{\frac{2}{L}}sin(\frac{n\pi}{L}x)

Okay, so now:

\left\langle \hat{p} \right\rangle = \int\phi^*\hat{p}\phi

since we have found that phi* = phi, I assume:

\left\langle \hat{p} \right\rangle = \int^L_0\sqrt{\frac{2}{L}}sin(\frac{n\pi}{L}x) (-i\hbar \frac{\partial}{\partial x}\sqrt{\frac{2}{L}}sin(\frac{n\pi}{L}x)dx

and thus:

\left\langle \hat{p} \right\rangle = \int^L_0\sqrt{\frac{2}{L}}sin(\frac{n\pi}{L}x) (-i\hbar \sqrt{\frac{2}{L}}\frac{\partial}{\partial x}sin(\frac{n\pi}{L}x)dx

and:

\left\langle \hat{p} \right\rangle = \int^L_0\sqrt{\frac{2}{L}}sin(\frac{n\pi}{L}x) (-i\hbar \sqrt{\frac{2}{L}}\frac{n\pi}{L} cos(\frac{n\pi}{L}x)dx

Rearrange:

=-\frac{2n\pi}{L^2}\int^L_0 sin(\frac{n\pi}{L}x)(cos(\frac{n\pi}{L}x)

Does this look okay so far?
 
  • #38
Okay, I am not sure for the p-hat one I just did, but I have done the x ones, and I have got:

&lt;\hat{x}&gt; = \phi^*x\phi

= \frac{2}{L}\int^L_0 sin (\frac{n\pi}{L}x)xsin (\frac{n\pi}{L}x)

= \frac{2}{L}\int^L_0 x sin^2 (\frac{n\pi}{L}x)

using the substituion for sin^2:

= \frac{2}{L}\int^L_0 \frac{x}{2} x\frac{cos(2kx){2}

using the product rule, I get:

\frac{2}{L}[\frac{xksin(2kx)}{2} + \frac{x^2}{2}\frac{cos2kx}{2}]

insert values:

\frac{2}{L}[\frac{L ksin(2kL)}{2} + \frac{L^2}{2}\frac{cos2kL}{2}]

insert k:

\frac{2}{L}[\frac{L \frac{n\pi}{L}sin(2\frac{n\pi}{L}L)}{2} + \frac{L^2}{2}\frac{cos2\frac{n\pi}{L}L}{2}]

Cancel down:

\frac{2}{L}[\frac{n\pi sin(2n\pi)}{2} + \frac{L^2}{2}\frac{cos2n\pi}{2}]

Since sin n*pi = 0, cos npi = 1:

\frac{2}{L}[\frac{L^2}{2}\frac{1}{2}]

and:

\frac{2L^2}{2L}\frac{1}{2}

Giving:

&lt;\hat{x}&gt; = \frac{L}{2}

And, similarly for <x^2>

&lt;\hat{x}&gt; = \phi^*x^2\phi

= \frac{2}{L}\int^L_0 sin (\frac{n\pi}{L}x)x^2 sin (\frac{n\pi}{L}x)

= \frac{2}{L}\int^L_0 x^2 sin^2 (\frac{n\pi}{L}x)

using the substituion for sin^2:

= \frac{2}{L}\int^L_0 \frac{x^2}{2} x^2\frac{cos(2kx){2}

using the product rule, I get:

\frac{2}{L}[\frac{x^2ksin(2kx)}{2} - \frac{x^3}{6}\frac{cos2kx}{2}]

inserting the values for k and x:

\frac{2}{L}[\frac{L^2ksin(2kL)}{2} - \frac{L^3}{6}\frac{cos2kL}{2}]

\frac{2}{L}[\frac{L^2\frac{n\pi}{L}sin(2\frac{n\pi}{L}L)}{2} - \frac{L^3}{6}\frac{cos2\frac{n\pi}{L}L}{2}]

Cancel down:

\frac{2}{L}[\frac{L n\pi sin(2n\pi}{2} - \frac{L^3}{6}\frac{cos2n\pi}{2}]

Using same cos and sin rules:

\frac{2}{L}[- \frac{L^3}{6}\frac{1}{2}]

-\frac{L^2}{6}

Thus:

\Delta \hat{x} = \sqrt{&lt;\hat{x^2}&gt; - &lt;\hat{x}&gt;^2}

and:

\Delta \hat{x} = \sqrt{&lt;-\frac{L^2}{6}&gt; - &lt;{\frac{L^2}{4}}&gt;^2}

\Delta \hat{x} = \sqrt{&lt;-\frac{L^2}{6}&gt; - &lt;{\frac{L^2}{4}}&gt;^2}

Does this look okay?
 
  • #39
For <p> you've got the right general form, but I'm wondering about some of the constants (not that they'll matter in the end). <x> the answer came out ok, the stuff in between doesn't look completely ok. <x^2> CAN'T be negative. Why not? Think about it.
 
  • #40
Okay,

<x^2> can't be negatvive because it is squared,;

I was writing the working out down to hand in, but I didn't use copy from my notes, and it looked slightly better, but it gave me:

<x> = L

<x^2> = 2/3 L^2

trouble is when working out the Delta:

\Delta\hat{x} = \sqrt{&lt;\hat^2&gt; - &lt;\hat&gt;^2}

trouble is I get a negative equation under the sqare root, which I know shouldn't be...?
 
  • #41
If you get a negative under the square root, then you made a mistake. I don't get <x>=L, I get <x>=L/2. <x^2> doesn't seem to come out as 2L^2/3 either. These are just integration problems now, not QM. So it doesn't take any deep thinking. You just have to do the integrations carefully.
 

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
46
Views
3K
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K