What Is the Source of Spin-Orbit Coupling in the Hydrogen Atom?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Tomer
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Coupling Spin-orbit
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the Spin-Orbit coupling effect in the Hydrogen atom, specifically addressing the transition from the electron's rest frame to the lab frame. The derived relation for the magnetic field of the proton, \vec{B}=\frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_{0}}\frac{e}{mc^{2}r^{3}}\vec{L}, connects the proton's magnetic field with the electron's orbital angular momentum. The conversation highlights the challenge of reconciling the absence of a magnetic field in the lab frame with the observed energy level splitting due to Spin-Orbit coupling. The participants conclude that the Hamiltonian's transformation maintains consistency across reference frames, ensuring that energy contributions remain valid regardless of the frame of reference.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Spin-Orbit coupling in quantum mechanics
  • Familiarity with Hamiltonian mechanics and its transformations
  • Knowledge of classical mechanics, particularly Lagrangian mechanics
  • Basic principles of electromagnetism, specifically magnetic fields
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of Spin-Orbit coupling in quantum mechanics
  • Explore Hamiltonian transformations in different reference frames
  • Investigate the implications of magnetic fields in quantum systems
  • Learn about relativistic corrections in quantum mechanics
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, quantum mechanics students, and researchers interested in atomic physics and the effects of Spin-Orbit coupling on energy levels in hydrogen and similar systems.

Tomer
Messages
198
Reaction score
0
Hey everyone,

I've been reading about the Spin-Orbit coupling effect in the Hydrogen atom.
However, there's something I don't quite understand.
The effect is being explained and calculated like this: we move to the rest frame of the electron, in which the electron has no orbital angular momentum (spin stays, however). We then consider the magnetic field appearing caused by the proton, circulating around the electron in his rest system.
At a certain point, a relation is derived, connecting the magnetic field of the proton with the orbital angular momentum of the electron in the rest frame. (\vec{B}=\frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_{0}}\frac{e}{mc^{2}r^{3}}\vec{L})
From this point onward a new Hamiltonian element is being developed (including some relativistic corrections) as a perturbation of the original Hamiltonian, which was derived in the lab (/proton) rest frame.
My issue is this:
What is the source of this effect in the lab system? Since there's no magnetic field in this system, there should be no splitting (based on the SO effect)- yet there has to be one (it cannot depend on system of reference). And more then that - how can we analyze the effect in a certain system, and then just add it to the Hamiltonian of the original system, which was the rest frame of the proton? In the electron's rest frame there isn't any kinetic energy of the electron, for example, so the energy levels are completely different...

I'd really appreciate an explanation :-)

Thanks,
Tomer.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In classical mechanics, the Lagrangian of a system of particles transforms as:
<br /> L&#039; = L - \vec{V} \cdot \vec{P} + \frac{1}{2} M V^{2}<br />
where \vec{V} is the relative velocity of the two frames, \vec{P} = \sum{m_a \, \vec{v}_a}, and M = \sum_{a}{m_a} is the total mass of the system.

On the other hand, the quantity:
<br /> \sum_{a}{\vec{p}&#039;_a \cdot \vec{v}&#039;_a} = \sum_{a}{\vec{p}_a \cdot \vec{v}_a} - 2 \vec{V} \cdot \vec{P} + M V^2<br />
follows the specified transformation rule. Thus, the Hamiltonian:
<br /> H&#039; \equiv \sum_{a}{\vec{p}&#039;_a \cdot \vec{v}&#039;_a} - L&#039; = H - \vec{V} \cdot \vec{P} + \frac{1}{2} M V^2<br />

In the CM frame, \vec{P} = 0, so the Hamiltonian differs only by the total kinetic energy of the system. Therefore, if we calculate any addition to the Hamiltonian in one frame, it will have the same contribution in any other as well.
 
Ok, I think I got it - thanks!
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K