What is the temperature of the CMBR?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter photonkid
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cmbr Temperature
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The temperature of the Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation (CMBR) is definitively measured at approximately 2.7 degrees Kelvin, a result of the universe's expansion which stretches the wavelengths of emitted radiation. The temperature is determined through the analysis of the power spectrum of the CMBR, which fits the black body radiation curve, confirming the temperature through molecular excitation in the intergalactic medium. Photon density decreases over time due to the expansion of the universe, affecting the energy per volume of the CMBR. The redshift factor, approximately 1090, indicates that the wavelengths have expanded significantly since their emission, correlating to an original temperature of around 3000K at the time of emission.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of black body radiation and its curves
  • Familiarity with redshift concepts in cosmology
  • Knowledge of photon density and its implications in thermal radiation
  • Basic grasp of the cosmic microwave background and its significance in astrophysics
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the implications of redshift in cosmological models
  • Study the methods of measuring cosmic microwave background temperature
  • Investigate the relationship between photon density and temperature in expanding universes
  • Learn about the significance of the black body radiation curve in astrophysical contexts
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, astrophysicists, and students of cosmology who are interested in understanding the properties and implications of the Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation and its role in the evolution of the universe.

photonkid
Messages
35
Reaction score
0
I've read that the temperature of the CMBR is 2.7 degrees K or so and is much cooler than when it started out, due to the expansion of the universe making the wavelength longer.

What is meant by the temperature of the CMBR? How do you measure it? Is it determines purely by the wavelength?

Is the "photon density" a factor in the temperature?

Is the photon density of the CMBR changing over time? i.e. since the "surface of last scattering" is increasing in size, shouldn't the amount of photons that reach us in a given time period be increasing?

The observable universe (including the CMBR) is said to homogeneous and isotropic. Is it possible that the CMBR we see is not actually isotropic but the differences are too small to be detectable and that there actually is a "center" to the universe somewhere, outside the observable universe.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
The CMB temperature is affirmed in various ways. One of the more compelling is molecular excitation in the intergalactic medium. We have detected these at great distances and they confirm theoretical CMB temperature projections. See http://arxiv.org/abs/1212.5456, A precise and accurate determination of the cosmic microwave background temperature at z=0.89.
 
photonkid said:
...What is meant by the temperature of the CMBR? How do you measure it? Is it determines purely by the wavelength? ...

Here is a picture of black body radiation curve at various temperatures 3000K, 4000K, 5000K
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Black_body.svg

There is a particular "lopsided bell-curve" shape to power per wavelength distribution curve that you find in the heat glow from a warm or hot object.

Where the PEAK power comes depends on the temperature. You can tell the temperature of a generic dull-finish surface by finding the peak wavelength. The interval of wavelengths where you get the most energy per unit time, the most "wattage".

I think you may know this because you say
How do you measure it? Is it determine purely by the wavelength?

the answer is basically YES, they measure the whole power spectrum, how much wattage in each wavelength bracket. They find they get a PERFECT FIT to the black body curve for a certain temperature, the right peak, the right slopes the right tails, everything fits!

From there it is an easy step to start talking about the "temperature" of the CMB light.

The estimated REDSHIFT z, or let me say the wave stretch factor z+1, is about 1090. Wavelengths and distances have expanded by a factor of 1090 since the light was emitted.

If you divided every wavelength by 1090 and look at the power spectrum then, you see the spectrum of heat glow of an object at about 3000K, like in the diagram.

So the temperature of the gas, when the CMB was emitted, that we are now getting, was about 3000K. And the "temperature of the ancient light" at that time of emission was 3000K.
========
You talk about "photon density". That goes along with this in a consistent way. As distances and wavelengths have expanded by a factor of about 1000, volumes have expanded by a factor of 1,000,000,000. So densities have gone down by a factor of a billion.
It doesn't matter about the area of the "last scattering" increasing. As there get to be more units of area shooting, we get to look like a smaller and smaller target, and it cancels. What matters is that space is filled with a certain density of ancient light, coming from wherever, and as volumes expand the number density of photons declines.

Also the energy of each photon falls off as wavelength increases. So energy per volume falls off as the fourth power of the length scale.

But this is routine. Just how thermal radiation behaves. Energy per volume falls off as the fourth power of temperature. (Temperature is what falls off as the length scale increases)
====
So yes to your question. The temperature of the CMB now (and also the temperature back then when it was emitted from the hot gas) is told from the curve that shows how power is distributed over the range of wavelengths---the so called "spectrum".

You can get a rough idea just from the peak power wavelength bracket. But for more precision they measure and plot the whole curve over many brackets.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person

Similar threads

  • · Replies 57 ·
2
Replies
57
Views
6K
  • · Replies 70 ·
3
Replies
70
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K