What is the Time Complexity of this Vertex Cover Algorithm?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the time complexity of a proposed algorithm for finding an optimal vertex cover of a tree in linear time, specifically aiming for $O(n)$ complexity. The algorithm utilizes depth-first search (DFS) but initially miscalculates the time complexity as $O(|V| \cdot |E|)$. Participants clarify that the correct time complexity for DFS is $O(|V| + |E|)$, emphasizing the need to visit each vertex and edge only once to achieve linear performance. Modifications to the algorithm are suggested to align with this linear time complexity goal.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of graph theory concepts, specifically vertex cover.
  • Familiarity with depth-first search (DFS) algorithm.
  • Knowledge of time complexity analysis in algorithms.
  • Basic programming skills to implement graph algorithms.
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the properties of vertex cover in trees and graphs.
  • Study the depth-first search (DFS) algorithm in detail.
  • Learn about time complexity analysis techniques for graph algorithms.
  • Explore modifications to DFS for optimizing graph traversal.
USEFUL FOR

Computer scientists, algorithm developers, and students studying graph algorithms who are interested in optimizing vertex cover solutions and understanding time complexity in depth.

evinda
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,741
Reaction score
0
Hello! (Wave)

I want to write an algorithm that finds an optimal vertex cover of a tree in linear time $O(n)$, where $n$ is the number of the vertices of the tree..

A vertex cover of a graph $G=(V,E)$ is a subset $W$ of $V$ such that for every edge $(a,b)$ in $E$, a is in $W$ or $b$ is in $W$.In a vertex cover we need to have at least one vertex for each edge.
If we pick a non-leaf, it can cover more than one edge.
That's why I thought we can do it as follows:
We visit the root of the tree, then we visit one of its children, a child of the latter that we visited and so on..
Then if we have reached at a leaf, we check if we already have taken its father for the optimal vertex cover, and if not we pick it. Then, if the vertex that we picked for the optimal vertex cover has also other children, we pick the first of them and visit the leftmost children recursively and if we reach at the leaf and its father hasn't been chosen for the desired vertex cover, we choose it and so on.

I have written the following algorithm:

Code:
   DFS(node x){
      discovered[x]=1;
      for each (v in Adj(x)){
          if discovered[v]==0{
             DFS(v);
             if (v->taken==0){
                 x<-taken=1;
             }
          }
      }
    }

Its time complexity is $T(n)=\sum_{i=1}^{|V|} O(|V_i|+|E_i|) \leq \sum_{i=1}^{|V|} O(|E_i|) \leq \sum_{i=1}^{|V|} O(|E|)=O(|V| \cdot |E|)$.

($|V_i|, |E_i|$ are the number of vertices and edges respectively of the subtrees at the root of which we call DFS )

Is the time complexity I found right? Or have I calculated it wrong? (Thinking)
 
Technology news on Phys.org


Hello there!

Your proposed algorithm looks like a good start. However, there are a few things that need to be clarified in order to accurately determine the time complexity.

Firstly, it is important to note that the time complexity for DFS is typically represented as $O(|V| + |E|)$, where $|V|$ is the number of vertices and $|E|$ is the number of edges. This is because in the worst case scenario, we would have to visit all of the vertices and edges in the graph.

In your algorithm, you have defined $|V_i|$ and $|E_i|$ as the number of vertices and edges in the subtrees at the root of which you call DFS. However, it is not clear how these values are determined and how they relate to the overall time complexity.

Additionally, in your algorithm, you have a nested for loop where you are iterating through all of the adjacent vertices for each vertex. This would result in a time complexity of $O(|V| \cdot |E|)$, which is different from the linear time complexity that you are aiming for.

To achieve a linear time complexity, you would need to modify your algorithm so that it only visits each vertex and edge once. One approach could be to use a modified version of depth-first search (DFS) where you keep track of the vertices that have been visited and their adjacent vertices. This would allow you to only visit each vertex and edge once, resulting in a time complexity of $O(|V| + |E|)$.

I hope this helps clarify the time complexity for your algorithm. Let me know if you have any further questions or concerns. Keep up the good work!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K