What is the true definition and meaning of sin/cos/tan?

  • Thread starter Thread starter physior
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Definition
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion clarifies the definitions of sine (sin), cosine (cos), and tangent (tan) using the unit circle, emphasizing that these functions extend beyond right triangles to include all real numbers. The unit circle, defined by the equation x² + y² = 1, allows for the calculation of sin and cos for angles greater than 90 degrees and negative angles. Additionally, the discussion highlights the periodic nature of these functions and their relevance in modeling natural phenomena, such as harmonic motion, through differential equations and power series expansions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic trigonometric functions: sine, cosine, tangent
  • Familiarity with the unit circle and its properties
  • Knowledge of periodic functions and their applications
  • Basic concepts of differential equations and power series
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the unit circle and its role in defining trigonometric functions
  • Explore the relationship between trigonometric functions and harmonic motion
  • Learn about the Taylor series and Maclaurin series for sine and cosine
  • Investigate the applications of trigonometric functions in solving differential equations
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, educators, and anyone interested in deepening their understanding of trigonometric functions and their applications in various fields, including physics and engineering.

  • #31
piethein21 said:
I think the unit circle is taken not because of physical reasons but mathematical ones.
The main reason I think is because of the
##e^{i\theta}=\cos{\theta}+i\sin{\theta}## (how do i add latex in my reply...I am new).
Suppose it had radius 2 then we would have
##2=e^{i2\pi}=e^{i\pi}e^{i\pi}=-2*-2##
which does not seem right
Correct - it's not right. ##e^{i 2\pi} = cos(2\pi) + i sin(2\pi) = 1 + 0i = 1##
You can't just come along and set this expression to 2.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
piethein21 said:
I think the unit circle is taken not because of physical reasons but mathematical ones.
The main reason I think is because of the
##e^{i\theta}=\cos{\theta}+i\sin{\theta}## (how do i add latex in my reply...I am new).
Suppose it had radius 2 then we would have
##2=e^{i2\pi}=e^{i\pi}e^{i\pi}=-2*-2##
which does not seem right

You're not using euler formula correctly.
##e^{i\theta}=\cos{\theta}+i\sin{\theta}##
This is correct.

but this:
##2=e^{i2\pi}=e^{i\pi}e^{i\pi}=-2*-2##
is not.

##2 = e^{i*2\pi} + e^{-i*2\pi} = 2e^{i*2\pi} = cos(2\pi) + i*sin(2\pi) + cos(2\pi) - i*sin(2\pi)##
OR ##=2[cos(2\pi) + i*sin(2\pi)##
the first expansion is a representation of the first eulers, and the second expansion is a representation of the second eulers.

You have ##e^{i\theta} = \cos{\theta}+i\sin{\theta}##
and ##e^{i*k\theta}= \cos{k\theta}+i\sin{k\theta}##
Where k can be any function.
 
Last edited:
  • #33
BiGyElLoWhAt said:
You're not using euler formula correctly.
##e^{i\theta}=\cos{\theta}+i\sin{\theta}##
This is correct.
Actually, using the alternative definitions of sin and cos that piethein21 was considering there, it's not. His sin and cos are exactly 2 times the normal sin and cos. So the left-hand side and the right-hand side don't have the same absolute value, unless we also redefine the exponential function as 2 times the normal exponential function. Of course, if we do that, then ##e^{x+y}=e^xe^y## doesn't hold, so his calculation is still wrong.

BiGyElLoWhAt said:
but this:
##2=e^{i2\pi}=e^{i\pi}e^{i\pi}=-2*-2##
is not.
It's probably time to close this thread, since it has drifted off topic. The OP just wanted to know how to define sin and cos with a domain larger than ##[0,2\pi]##. That was answered early in the thread. Most of the posts after that are based on misunderstandings and have nothing to do with the original topic.
 
Last edited:
  • #34
the time it was not properly used was to show it did not hold when rules where altered (so I am very aware that it was not correct). I agree with fredrik let's close the thread ... it is drifting...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K