What is the true definition and meaning of sin/cos/tan?

  • Thread starter Thread starter physior
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Definition
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the definitions and meanings of the trigonometric functions sine, cosine, and tangent, particularly in the context of right triangles and the unit circle. Participants explore how these definitions apply to various angles, including those beyond the typical range of a right triangle.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants question the adequacy of the right triangle definition for angles outside the range of 0 to 90 degrees and seek a deeper understanding of the unit circle's role in defining these functions. Some express confusion about the implications of using the unit circle for arbitrary angles and the periodic nature of the functions.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with various interpretations of the definitions being explored. Some participants have provided insights into the unit circle and its advantages, while others have raised concerns about the clarity of these explanations for those less familiar with advanced mathematical concepts.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted difficulty in reconciling the right triangle definition with the need for definitions applicable to all real numbers. The original poster's familiarity with the triangle definition contrasts with their request for broader definitions that encompass negative angles and periodicity.

  • #31
piethein21 said:
I think the unit circle is taken not because of physical reasons but mathematical ones.
The main reason I think is because of the
##e^{i\theta}=\cos{\theta}+i\sin{\theta}## (how do i add latex in my reply...I am new).
Suppose it had radius 2 then we would have
##2=e^{i2\pi}=e^{i\pi}e^{i\pi}=-2*-2##
which does not seem right
Correct - it's not right. ##e^{i 2\pi} = cos(2\pi) + i sin(2\pi) = 1 + 0i = 1##
You can't just come along and set this expression to 2.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
piethein21 said:
I think the unit circle is taken not because of physical reasons but mathematical ones.
The main reason I think is because of the
##e^{i\theta}=\cos{\theta}+i\sin{\theta}## (how do i add latex in my reply...I am new).
Suppose it had radius 2 then we would have
##2=e^{i2\pi}=e^{i\pi}e^{i\pi}=-2*-2##
which does not seem right

You're not using euler formula correctly.
##e^{i\theta}=\cos{\theta}+i\sin{\theta}##
This is correct.

but this:
##2=e^{i2\pi}=e^{i\pi}e^{i\pi}=-2*-2##
is not.

##2 = e^{i*2\pi} + e^{-i*2\pi} = 2e^{i*2\pi} = cos(2\pi) + i*sin(2\pi) + cos(2\pi) - i*sin(2\pi)##
OR ##=2[cos(2\pi) + i*sin(2\pi)##
the first expansion is a representation of the first eulers, and the second expansion is a representation of the second eulers.

You have ##e^{i\theta} = \cos{\theta}+i\sin{\theta}##
and ##e^{i*k\theta}= \cos{k\theta}+i\sin{k\theta}##
Where k can be any function.
 
Last edited:
  • #33
BiGyElLoWhAt said:
You're not using euler formula correctly.
##e^{i\theta}=\cos{\theta}+i\sin{\theta}##
This is correct.
Actually, using the alternative definitions of sin and cos that piethein21 was considering there, it's not. His sin and cos are exactly 2 times the normal sin and cos. So the left-hand side and the right-hand side don't have the same absolute value, unless we also redefine the exponential function as 2 times the normal exponential function. Of course, if we do that, then ##e^{x+y}=e^xe^y## doesn't hold, so his calculation is still wrong.

BiGyElLoWhAt said:
but this:
##2=e^{i2\pi}=e^{i\pi}e^{i\pi}=-2*-2##
is not.
It's probably time to close this thread, since it has drifted off topic. The OP just wanted to know how to define sin and cos with a domain larger than ##[0,2\pi]##. That was answered early in the thread. Most of the posts after that are based on misunderstandings and have nothing to do with the original topic.
 
Last edited:
  • #34
the time it was not properly used was to show it did not hold when rules where altered (so I am very aware that it was not correct). I agree with fredrik let's close the thread ... it is drifting...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K