What is the true definition and meaning of sin/cos/tan?

  • Thread starter Thread starter physior
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Definition
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the definitions of sine, cosine, and tangent, highlighting their roles as ratios of sides in right triangles but also emphasizing their broader definitions via the unit circle. The unit circle allows these functions to be defined for all real numbers, including angles greater than 90 degrees and negative angles, which the traditional triangle definition cannot accommodate. Participants note that using the unit circle clarifies the periodic nature of these functions and their applications in various mathematical contexts, such as harmonic motion. Additionally, while the triangle definition is useful for acute angles, the unit circle provides a more comprehensive understanding of trigonometric functions. Overall, the conversation underscores the importance of the unit circle in extending the applicability of sine, cosine, and tangent beyond basic right triangle geometry.
  • #31
piethein21 said:
I think the unit circle is taken not because of physical reasons but mathematical ones.
The main reason I think is because of the
##e^{i\theta}=\cos{\theta}+i\sin{\theta}## (how do i add latex in my reply...I am new).
Suppose it had radius 2 then we would have
##2=e^{i2\pi}=e^{i\pi}e^{i\pi}=-2*-2##
which does not seem right
Correct - it's not right. ##e^{i 2\pi} = cos(2\pi) + i sin(2\pi) = 1 + 0i = 1##
You can't just come along and set this expression to 2.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
piethein21 said:
I think the unit circle is taken not because of physical reasons but mathematical ones.
The main reason I think is because of the
##e^{i\theta}=\cos{\theta}+i\sin{\theta}## (how do i add latex in my reply...I am new).
Suppose it had radius 2 then we would have
##2=e^{i2\pi}=e^{i\pi}e^{i\pi}=-2*-2##
which does not seem right

You're not using euler formula correctly.
##e^{i\theta}=\cos{\theta}+i\sin{\theta}##
This is correct.

but this:
##2=e^{i2\pi}=e^{i\pi}e^{i\pi}=-2*-2##
is not.

##2 = e^{i*2\pi} + e^{-i*2\pi} = 2e^{i*2\pi} = cos(2\pi) + i*sin(2\pi) + cos(2\pi) - i*sin(2\pi)##
OR ##=2[cos(2\pi) + i*sin(2\pi)##
the first expansion is a representation of the first eulers, and the second expansion is a representation of the second eulers.

You have ##e^{i\theta} = \cos{\theta}+i\sin{\theta}##
and ##e^{i*k\theta}= \cos{k\theta}+i\sin{k\theta}##
Where k can be any function.
 
Last edited:
  • #33
BiGyElLoWhAt said:
You're not using euler formula correctly.
##e^{i\theta}=\cos{\theta}+i\sin{\theta}##
This is correct.
Actually, using the alternative definitions of sin and cos that piethein21 was considering there, it's not. His sin and cos are exactly 2 times the normal sin and cos. So the left-hand side and the right-hand side don't have the same absolute value, unless we also redefine the exponential function as 2 times the normal exponential function. Of course, if we do that, then ##e^{x+y}=e^xe^y## doesn't hold, so his calculation is still wrong.

BiGyElLoWhAt said:
but this:
##2=e^{i2\pi}=e^{i\pi}e^{i\pi}=-2*-2##
is not.
It's probably time to close this thread, since it has drifted off topic. The OP just wanted to know how to define sin and cos with a domain larger than ##[0,2\pi]##. That was answered early in the thread. Most of the posts after that are based on misunderstandings and have nothing to do with the original topic.
 
Last edited:
  • #34
the time it was not properly used was to show it did not hold when rules where altered (so I am very aware that it was not correct). I agree with fredrik let's close the thread ... it is drifting...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K