What is the upper envelope of the family of ballistic curves?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mathmathmad
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The upper envelope of the family of ballistic curves defined by the equation y = ax - [x^2(a^2+1)]/2 is determined by maximizing the function g(a) = ax - [x^2(a^2+1)]/2 with respect to the parameter a. The critical point occurs at a = 1/x, leading to the upper envelope function F(x) = (1/2)x^2. This result is confirmed through substitution back into the original equation, demonstrating that F(x) represents the maximum value of g(a) for each fixed x.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of calculus, particularly differentiation and critical points
  • Familiarity with quadratic functions and their properties
  • Knowledge of the concept of upper envelopes in mathematical analysis
  • Basic algebra for manipulating equations and functions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the method of finding upper envelopes in families of curves
  • Learn about optimization techniques in calculus, focusing on critical points
  • Explore the properties of quadratic functions and their graphs
  • Investigate applications of ballistic curves in physics and engineering
USEFUL FOR

Students in mathematics, particularly those studying calculus and optimization, as well as educators and professionals involved in physics and engineering applications of projectile motion.

mathmathmad
Messages
50
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


find the upper envelope for the family of ballistic curves :

y = ax - [x^2(a^2+1)]/2

an upper envelope is a curve y=F(x) such that for each x fixed, F(x) is the maximum of g(a) = ax - [x^2(a^2+1)]/2 for a in R

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


diff g(a) wrt to a and equate to 0 and get a=1/x so F(x) is 1/x?? :(
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are right to start by finding the maximum of g_x(a) = ax - \frac12 x^2 (a^2 + 1), but you need to prove that the maximum of g_x occurs at the single critical point you find.

However, you have found the value of a which maximizes g_x(a) = F(x) at that x --- not what you want, which is the value of the function at that point, expressed as a function of x. What further computation is necessary here?
 
Am I right in thinking you then have to sub the a=1/x back into the original y to get,

y=F(x)=(1/2) x^2

and mathmathmad your a warwick student right?
 
blackscorpion said:
Am I right in thinking you then have to sub the a=1/x back into the original y to get,

y=F(x)=(1/2) x^2

and mathmathmad your a warwick student right?

I do not think so as it is not related with F(x) being maximum of g(a). Btw blackscorpian, I've sent you a pm.
 
is it F(x)=1/2 - x^2/2 instead?

@blackscorpion : yes... I am. you too?
 
Yes it is
 
Ahhh crap, it is aswell.
Stupidly canceled the ones forgettin bout the over 2 part.
Well that's a mark thrown away, lol
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K