What is the Weight of a Spacecraft at Various Distances from Earth?

  • Thread starter Thread starter skins266
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Spacecraft
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The original poster is investigating the weight of a spacecraft at various distances from Earth, specifically at the Earth's radius and twice that distance. The problem involves gravitational force calculations using the formula F=GMeMship/r^2.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the importance of using consistent units, particularly converting distances from kilometers to meters. There are suggestions to consider ratios for gravitational force rather than direct calculations. Some participants explore the implications of the inverse square law on gravitational force as distance changes.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing guidance on unit conversion and the application of gravitational principles. There is no explicit consensus, but several productive directions are being explored regarding the relationship between distance and gravitational force.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the need for clarity on the units used in calculations and the assumptions regarding the distances involved in the problem. The original poster expresses uncertainty about their approach and the correctness of their calculations.

skins266
Messages
14
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The radius of the Earth is about 6.38E3 km. A 7.38E3 N spacecraft travels away from Earth. What is the weight of the spacecraft at the following disatnaces.

a)6.38E3 km
b)1.31E4 km

Homework Equations



F=GMeMship/r^2


The Attempt at a Solution



but that won't work because the mass of the ship is in N so I divide it by 9.8 and then the two radiuses need to be added so it will look like this

F = (6.67E-11)(5.98E24)(753.1)/(6.38E3+6.38E3)^2

=3E17/1.63E8

=1840490798

but that is not the right answer when I punch it into Webassign, and I figure once I get the first one the second one is exactly the same way. So what am I doing wrong?

Oh and the answers are in Newtons
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For one thing, you'd better put the distances in meters. The same as the units of the other constants in that equation. You can also solve the problem more directly by considering ratios. E.g. for part a) compare the force at R with the force at 2R. You don't need any numbers to do that.
 
Last edited:
All you have to do is to compute the force. The units of force are Newtons, and "weight" is defined as the gravitational force.

You're chief problem here is one of units. Here is a very good practice you should try to get in the habit of using: Always express the units in an equation. For example, don't just use 6.67*10^{-11}, use the value with its units, 6.67*10^{-11}\mathrm{m}^3/\mathrm{kg}/\mathrm{s}^2. The same goes for the masses and distances. You have to make sure the units match.
 
so, just in units, (m^3/kg/s^2)(kg)(?)/(km^2). So how do I convert m^3 to km? and what is the missing unit. Other than that I have the equation right?
 
The equation is fine. km=1000*m. So km^3=10^9*m^3. But it's easier just to convert you km radii to m. Easier still to work out the answer using proportions. If the radius changes by a factor of K, by what factor does the force change?
 
it would be by K
 
skins266 said:
it would be by K

Nooo. What power is r in your equation? If R -> 2R then...
 
then it would be multiplied by two and squared
 
If you mean the force is divided by 4, yes. 1/R^2 -> 1/(2R)^2=(1/R^2)/4.
 
  • #10
but which one is R, the radius of the Earth added to the radius where the spaceship is at, or what?
 
  • #11
Think about it. a) says compare the force at radius R (radius of the earth), with the force at radius 2R.
 
  • #12
so I just multiply my answer by the number in a)?
 
  • #13
skins266 said:
so I just multiply my answer by the number in a)?

I don't know what that means. Gravity is an inverse square law. Doubling distance reduces the force by a factor of four. Etc.
 
  • #14
i didn't know that, but where I am going off track here. Since my equation was right shouldn't I have the right answer? Or is it the units thing that I can't figure out?
 
  • #15
It's the units thing. Your equation is correct. Just convert the km to m. 6.83E3km=6.83E6m.
 
  • #16
Never mind.
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
6K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K