What keeps the planets in orbit

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter G.U.T.finder
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Orbit Planets
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the mechanics of planetary orbits, specifically addressing the misleading nature of the trampoline analogy used to explain gravitational interactions. Participants clarify that planets maintain their orbits due to their tangential velocity, which prevents them from crashing into the sun. The conversation critiques the rubber sheet analogy, emphasizing its inadequacy for a deeper understanding of gravitational dynamics and spacetime curvature.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of gravitational forces and orbital mechanics
  • Familiarity with spacetime concepts in physics
  • Knowledge of tangential velocity and its role in orbits
  • Awareness of common analogies used in physics education
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the concept of spacetime curvature and its implications for gravity
  • Study Newton's laws of motion and their application to planetary orbits
  • Explore simulations of gravitational interactions using software like Universe Sandbox
  • Investigate the role of dark matter in cosmic structures and its effects on gravity
USEFUL FOR

Astronomy enthusiasts, physics students, educators, and anyone interested in understanding the fundamental principles of planetary motion and gravitational forces.

G.U.T.finder
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
If the reason why the planets orbit around the sun is the deviations in the fabric of spacetime,what keeps the planets from crashing into each other? Like if I put a boulder on a trampoline and then I put a baseball next, the baseball would go toward the boulder. I think it could be dark matter pushing the planets away and gravity bringing them closer in equilibrium. But who knows the correct answer ( if there is one).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
G.U.T.finder said:
Like if I put a boulder on a trampoline and then I put a baseball next, the baseball would go toward the boulder.

You're one of many people who have been misled by the trampoline analogy. It makes for nice pictures and non-technical descriptions of kinda sort of what's happening, but it's very misleading if you want to really understand what's going on.

You can search this forum for some of the previous criticism of the trampoline analogy (try searching on "rubber sheet").
 
Nugatory said:
You're one of many people who have been misled by the trampoline analogy. It makes for nice pictures and non-technical descriptions of kinda sort of what's happening, but it's very misleading if you want to really understand what's going on.

While I'm firmly in the "the rubber sheet analogy is horrible" camp, it can handle OP's question just fine. Planets are in orbit around the sun. If they didn't have orbital velocity, they would crash into the sun just like OP is suggesting. As it is, they do have tangential velocity so they effectively "fall around" the sun. You can simulate this perfectly well with a boulder and a baseball on a trampoline, though friction will damp things pretty quickly.

It's still a bad analogy though.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
7K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K