What kind of math notation is this?

  • Thread starter Thread starter muffinman123
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Notation
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a specific type of mathematical notation, primarily index notation, used to express functions and their mappings concisely. The notation indicates that there are two functions, γ1 and γ2, each mapping subsets of real numbers into a set M. Additionally, the notation involving σαβ and Jσαβ describes a list of functions that map various spaces Vαβ into n x n matrices with real components. The discussion confirms that this notation is indeed written in LaTeX, a typesetting system commonly used for mathematical and scientific documents. Understanding this notation is essential for interpreting complex mathematical expressions efficiently.
muffinman123
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
what kind of math language is this?

$I\subset \reals$
$$\gamma_i:I_i\rightarrow M,\quad I_i\subset\reals,\quad i=1,2$$
$\sigma_{\alpha\beta}$ , let $$\rJ\sigma_{\alpha\beta}:V_{\alpha\beta}\rightarrow \Mat_{n,n}(\reals)$$


I have seen this notation thrown around in this forum, but I never understood what they mean.
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
This is index notation in order to express concisely a list of many equations or functions.
For example, the first line that you write states that there are two distinct functions γ1 and γ2 such that γ1 maps I1 into M where I1 is a subset of the real numbers and γ2 maps I2 into M where I2 is a subset of the real numbers.
The arrow notation defines the domain and codomain of the function: I1 is the domain of γ1 and M is the codomain.
The second set of notation has two indexes on each object; each index is taken to vary independently. For example, if the restrictions on α and β were explicitly given as α = 1, 2 and β = 1, 2, then the expression is a concise way of expressing the following list of expressions:
\text{For }\sigma_{11},\text{ let }J\sigma_{11} : V_{11}\rightarrow\text{Mat}_{n, n}(\Re)
\text{For }\sigma_{12},\text{ let }J\sigma_{12} : V_{12}\rightarrow\text{Mat}_{n, n}(\Re)
\text{For }\sigma_{21},\text{ let }J\sigma_{21} : V_{21}\rightarrow\text{Mat}_{n, n}(\Re)
\text{For }\sigma_{22},\text{ let }J\sigma_{22} : V_{22}\rightarrow\text{Mat}_{n, n}(\Re)
In words, the sentence defines a list of 4 functions Jσ_ab that maps each respective space V_ab into the set of nxn matrices with real components. In particular, this means that Jσ_12 takes an element of V_12 as an input and returns an nxn matrix with real components as an output. The explicit operation performed by the function on those elements of V_12 is not specified in this expression.
 
alright, let me make this question simpler, what language is this?
is it latex?
 
Yes. You can learn more about how it is used on this forum here.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
125
Views
19K
Replies
42
Views
10K
2
Replies
69
Views
8K
Back
Top