What kind of wave is associated with particles , in wave particle duality?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the nature of the wave associated with particles in the context of wave-particle duality, exploring theoretical implications and interpretations within quantum mechanics. Participants examine the significance of De Broglie's wavelength and the relationship between wave functions and probability, as well as the implications of mass and energy on wave behavior.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that the wave associated with particles is not an electromagnetic wave or a probability wave, raising questions about its nature and significance.
  • One participant emphasizes that the quantum mechanical wave function is not fully understood, and interpretations vary among physicists, though they all rely on the same mathematical framework.
  • Another participant suggests that the "wave" in wave-particle duality refers more to observed behaviors like diffraction and interference rather than a physical wave description.
  • A participant discusses the relationship between the wave function's amplitude and probability, noting that while amplitudes can be negative, probabilities cannot, leading to the concept of probability amplitude.
  • There is a clarification that De Broglie's wavelength is related to a particle's momentum rather than directly derived from mass-energy equivalence, with a formula provided: λ = h / p.
  • One participant notes that electrons exhibit different wavelengths at different energy levels, suggesting a relationship between energy and wavelength.
  • Another participant discusses how the mass of a particle affects its velocity and the uncertainty principle, indicating that heavier particles have lower velocities and vice versa.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the interpretation of wave functions and the nature of the wave associated with particles. There is no consensus on a singular interpretation or understanding of these concepts, indicating an ongoing debate.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights limitations in understanding the quantum mechanical wave function and the interpretations of its meaning. There are unresolved questions about the relationship between mass, energy, and wave behavior, as well as the implications of probability amplitudes.

Ahmed Abdullah
Messages
203
Reaction score
3
I know It is not EM wave.
It is not probability wave since probability can never be negative.

But I think De Broglie's wave length for particles (like electron) is derived using equation of mass-energy equivalence. It infers that this wave carries energy ;for this wave-length is same as that of EM energy equivalent to the particle (E=mc^2). Certainly the particle is not spontaneously changing to EM wave then again this EM wave somehow give rise to a particle.
So why have we used this equation to find the wave nature of particle? What is it's significance?
#Electron is both particle and wave.
What kind of wave?

It is a naive question from a novice and ignorant person, interested in quantum physics. please respond.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
We don't know what the quantum mechanical wave function is, in the sense that you seem to be looking for. All we know is what we can do with it: multiply it with its complex conjugate and use it as the particle's probability density: [itex]P(x) = \psi^*(x) \psi(x)[/itex].

Different people have different opinions about what [itex]\psi[/itex] "really" is or represents, that is, they favor different interpretations of quantum mechanics. All serious interpretations reduce ultimately to the same mathematics, because the standard mathematics of QM makes predictions that agree very well with experiment. There is as yet no way to distinguish between these interpretations by experiment. All people can do is argue about which interpretation is better. Probably most of the posts in this forum are connected with these arguments. :rolleyes:
 
Actually, I think this is a simpler question than it appears. The question that appears in the topic is:

What kind of wave is associated with particles , in wave particle duality?

The "wave" in the wave-particle duality isn't really a wave, but rather the behavior that is consistent with what we know from classical wave. So the "wave" in wave-particle duality is more of the observation of diffraction, interference, etc. which are all wave behavior. So essentially, it isn't really a description of the system, but rather a description of the observation.

Zz.
 
Thanks for prompt response jtbell.
Now please say what this wave-length really is?
If this is a question with no meaning then please interpret it in mathematics (better with explanation- i'am not a physics student).
 
Ahmed Abdullah: the wave has an amplitude, which can be negative. And you are right that probability can't be negative. However, have you heard that the wavefunction is representing the probability AMPLITUDE. In order to get a quantity, say probability, is to take the amplitude modulus square.

The same thing is for light, the intensity is the modulus square of the amplitude, the amplitude can be negative. And in QM, the amplitude can even be complex-valued.
 
Ahmed Abdullah said:
But I think De Broglie's wave length for particles (like electron) is derived using equation of mass-energy equivalence. It infers that this wave carries energy ;for this wave-length is same as that of EM energy equivalent to the particle (E=mc^2).

No, the wavelength of [itex]\psi[/itex] is related to the momentum of the particle: [itex]\lambda = h / p[/itex]. The momentum is related to the mass and energy of the particle by [itex]E^2 = (pc)^2 + (mc^2)^2[/itex].
 
jtbell said:
No, the wavelength of [itex]\psi[/itex] is related to the momentum of the particle: [itex]\lambda = h / p[/itex]. The momentum is related to the mass and energy of the particle by [itex]E^2 = (pc)^2 + (mc^2)^2[/itex].

Oh i got it. Electron has different wavelengths in different energy levels. :smile:
The equation suggests; the higher the energy level the lower the wavelength is.

malawi_glenn, ZapperZ and jtbell your inputs helped to improve my understandings. It's nice to learn in collaboration. Thank you guys a lot.
 
The wave associated with a particle is independent of charge of the particle .Whether the particle is negative or positive or neutral the wave associated with is same . But it depends on the Mass of the particle.If the particle is heaveir the particle has less velocity so position of particle can be determined and their is uncertainity in momentum and vice versa.i.e if the mass is less velocity is more.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
9K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
9K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K