What logical error am I making? (solving for T)

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on a physics problem involving tension in cables and the logical errors made in calculating the forces. The original attempt incorrectly assumed each cable supported the entire weight, leading to incorrect tension values. The correct approach involves considering all three cables and recognizing that the forces must balance at the connection point. The solution highlights the importance of vector addition and the correct orientation of forces in the diagram. Ultimately, the misinterpretation of the triangles and the labeling of forces led to the initial mistakes in calculating tensions.
Callista
Messages
5
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


homework-7-the-traffic-light-n.jpg


Homework Equations


Fg=mg

The Attempt at a Solution


I tried to set this up as two "triangles".

upload_2019-3-6_17-22-11.png
&&
upload_2019-3-6_17-22-26.png


left triangle:
sin(37)=mg/T
T1=mg/sin(37)
T1=202.72

right triangle:
sin(53)=mg/T
T2=mg/sin(53)
T2=152.761

I now know the correct answers are T1=73.4N and T2=97.4. However, I'm not sure what logical fault I'm making when I originally tried to solve the problem using the above method.

Thanks for your help.

EDIT 4. Solution
My mistakes were that I needed to consider all three cables, and that T1y≠T2y.
 

Attachments

  • upload_2019-3-6_17-22-11.png
    upload_2019-3-6_17-22-11.png
    639 bytes · Views: 634
  • upload_2019-3-6_17-22-26.png
    upload_2019-3-6_17-22-26.png
    609 bytes · Views: 634
  • homework-7-the-traffic-light-n.jpg
    homework-7-the-traffic-light-n.jpg
    53.7 KB · Views: 739
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, your first problem is that you are taking it as being the case that each angled rope supports the entire weight, so you are doing your calculations based on a traffic light weight of 244N
 
Hint: Force equilibrium for the connection point of the three wires.
 
Callista said:
However, I'm not sure what logical fault I'm making when I originally tried to solve the problem using the above method.
Your triangles are OK but misinterpreted. Since the 3 forces add to zero, they should form a closed triangle when you add the vectors using the "tail-to-tip" graphic method. Specifically here the vector addition triangle you get is a 3-4-5. If you follow the hint by @Orodruin, and look at the forces acting on the connection point, you will realize that T1 points "up and to the left", T2 points "up and to the right" and T3 (the weight) is vertical. Your triangles show one vertical force but they also show horizontal forces which can't be. If you rotate one of these triangles so that the hypotenuse is vertical, you will see that the right sides correctly point "up and to the left" and "up and to the right" in the vector addition diagram. In short, you have mislabeled the weight ##mg## as a right side in your triangles. Just because you drew one side vertical does not mean that it represents the weight.
 
  • Like
Likes Callista
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K