ImaLooser said:
Right. Most of physics is about unseen forces. Some of them take very specialized equipment to observe. Hidden. Occult.
I still don't think you are making a characterization of the real occult teachings.
The typical occult teachings talk about things that are not as narrow and specific that is covered in the sciences.
The occult doesn't cover things in a scientific way in a way that has the kind of scientific basis that electro-magnetism, the strong force, or longitudinal/transverse wave phenomena.
It deals with things that are completely different in terms of the scope and also in terms of the application that science deals with and unsurprisingly, a lot of scientists don't know (or want to know) about the occult.
Issaac Newton was one scientists who was into occultic (and also biblical) teachings, but he was according to history, a mathematician and natural scientist.
Part of the hidden aspect is not just about the actual detection of said information, but also the process that is involved with that information.
This again relates to the scope and focus of the two subjects and it is a primary reason why a lot of scientists refuse to even acknowledge occultist teachings whether they are true in part or not.
Also a lot of what natural scientists study is observable and not hidden with the sensory apparatus that they have.
I'll just leave with a thought that even though things can be observed (even with instruments like radio telescopes), the actual real meaning and attributes of the process at a high level will be neglected in a framework that puts all its focus on a narrow spectrum that trades off the larger picture with contextually rich detail for the much lower level picture that is a lot more analytically specific.