What makes the second argument in Schaum's Outline Calculus more rigorous?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter MaxManus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Argument Rigorous
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the differentiation of the exponential function, specifically addressing the expression Dx(ex) = ex. The first argument utilizes implicit differentiation and the relationship between a function and its inverse, while the second argument employs Theorem 10.2(b) to establish a more rigorous proof of the derivative of the inverse function. The second argument is deemed more rigorous as it explicitly verifies the conditions of the theorem for the specific function f(x) = ln(x) and its inverse f-1(y) = ey, ensuring that the differentiability criteria are met.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of implicit differentiation
  • Familiarity with the properties of logarithmic and exponential functions
  • Knowledge of Theorem 10.2(b) regarding the differentiability of inverse functions
  • Basic calculus concepts, including derivatives and continuity
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of Theorem 10.2(b) in greater detail
  • Explore the concept of implicit differentiation with various functions
  • Learn about the properties of inverse functions in calculus
  • Investigate additional examples of rigorous proofs in calculus
USEFUL FOR

Students of calculus, educators teaching advanced differentiation techniques, and anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of the rigor behind calculus proofs.

MaxManus
Messages
268
Reaction score
1
Hey, in my Schaum' Outline Calculus it says Dx(ex) = ex
Let y = ex. Then ln(y) = x. By implicit differentiation, \frac{1}{y}y' = 1
therefor y' = y = exFor a more rigorous argument, let f(x) = ln(x) and f-1(y) = ey.
Note that f'(x) = \frac{1}{x}. By Theorem 10.2(b).

(f-1)'(y) = \frac{1}{f'(f**-1(y))},

That is Dy = \frac{1}{1/e**y} = ey

10.2(b): Let f be one-to-one and continuous on the interval (a,b) Then:
If f'x(x0 is differentiable and f'(x0) != 0, then f-1 is
differentiable at y0 = f(x0) and (f-1)'(y0)
= \frac{1}{f'(x0}

Now, my question is what does "more rigorous argument" mean and what makes the second one more rigorous.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The first argument uses the fact (your "10.2(b)") that if y= f(x) and x= f-1(y) then
\frac{dx}{dy}= \frac{1}{\frac{dy}{dx}}
The second argument proves that is true for this particular function, as part of the proof.
 
Thanks
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K