What optimisation method to use?

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on optimizing the product HW under the constraint HW/(y0 + H) < E, with the goal of maximizing HW while considering H and W as functions of y0 and E. The user explores the implications of varying Ey0, noting that for Ey0 ≤ 1, H approaches infinity, while for Ey0 > 1, W approaches infinity. They suggest that increasing H is generally favored due to the constraint, but acknowledge practical limits on H and W in real-world scenarios. The user seeks verification of their conclusions and proposes comparing results for maximum W versus maximum H based on the value of Ey0. The conversation emphasizes the need for a fast numerical method to solve the optimization problem effectively.
makc
Messages
65
Reaction score
0
for the problem:
- find H and W as functions of y0, E (having a method to solve for y0 = const, E=const is fine, too) such as product HW is max, under constraint: HW/(y0 + H) < E

if numeric, the method should be fast.

any suggestions?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
...from my attempt at solution, I have W < Ey0/H + E versus W = (max)/H, so it looks like for Ey0 <= 1 I have H approaching infinity, and for > 1 I have W approaching infinity.

can someone verify this?

...EDIT now when I think about it more, it seems because of "W < ... + E" increasing H is always favoured, maybe not if we limit W and H to something less then infinity (in real world they are values no more than ~1000).
 
Last edited:
so it looks like this:

- if Ey0 > 1 compare results for max W versus max H under our constraint,
- otherwise use max H

am I right or what?
 
Here is a little puzzle from the book 100 Geometric Games by Pierre Berloquin. The side of a small square is one meter long and the side of a larger square one and a half meters long. One vertex of the large square is at the center of the small square. The side of the large square cuts two sides of the small square into one- third parts and two-thirds parts. What is the area where the squares overlap?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K