atlanticus
- 3
- 0
- TL;DR
- It can be something simple.
For example, things are caused by things, things move or don't move, there are big movements and small movements.
The discussion centers on the nature of time, emphasizing its qualities beyond linearity, motion, and speed. Participants agree that time is measurable, with accurate clocks providing a consistent measure of elapsed time. The conversation highlights the cause-effect directionality of time and its relationship with the speed of light. A key takeaway is that time is fundamentally defined as "what a clock measures," aligning with Einstein's perspective, and any further exploration of time's qualities requires precise definitions.
PREREQUISITESStudents of physics, philosophers exploring the nature of time, and anyone interested in the scientific measurement and conceptualization of time.
Thank you, I saw online a riddle that said time has seven components. I'm trying to figure out the last part. Is there something that time isn't hindered or affected by or vice versa?.Scott said:It's tied to the speed of light - so, in that sense, it "has speed".
It has an apparent cause-effect directionality.
You can use a clock to measure it. And in this classical Physics forum, two accurate clocks will agree with the amount of time that has elapsed.
Why do you ask?
There's no sensible answer to your question until you have defined what you mean by the word "time".atlanticus said:TL;DR Summary: It can be something simple.
Huh? What do you mean by "motion" of time? Time always moves forward (locally) at one second per second. I guess you could call that either motion or speed or both. Did you mean something else? It is linear in that time is always towards the future although I have a hard time calling that "linear".atlanticus said:What qualities does time have other than linearity, motion, and speed?