atlanticus
- 3
- 0
- TL;DR
- It can be something simple.
For example, things are caused by things, things move or don't move, there are big movements and small movements.
The discussion revolves around the qualities of time beyond its commonly recognized attributes of linearity, motion, and speed. Participants explore various conceptual and philosophical aspects of time, questioning its nature and measurement within the context of physics.
Participants express differing views on the nature of time, with no consensus reached on its qualities beyond linearity, motion, and speed. The discussion remains unresolved, particularly regarding the philosophical implications of time.
The discussion touches on the limitations of defining time, with some participants indicating that the question may delve into areas outside the scope of physics, such as psychology.
Thank you, I saw online a riddle that said time has seven components. I'm trying to figure out the last part. Is there something that time isn't hindered or affected by or vice versa?.Scott said:It's tied to the speed of light - so, in that sense, it "has speed".
It has an apparent cause-effect directionality.
You can use a clock to measure it. And in this classical Physics forum, two accurate clocks will agree with the amount of time that has elapsed.
Why do you ask?
There's no sensible answer to your question until you have defined what you mean by the word "time".atlanticus said:TL;DR Summary: It can be something simple.
Huh? What do you mean by "motion" of time? Time always moves forward (locally) at one second per second. I guess you could call that either motion or speed or both. Did you mean something else? It is linear in that time is always towards the future although I have a hard time calling that "linear".atlanticus said:What qualities does time have other than linearity, motion, and speed?