What Sci-Fi clichés do you resent?

  • Thread starter Thread starter chad hale
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sci-fi
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Start your own thread to ask a follow-up.
140 replies · 23K views · last reply
Whatching Dark Matter 2nd season. It is a great series, but i find something irritating, maybe it is not SF but general cliche: why is it that in majority of cases, strong female character means that she has a fist of iron? There are a dozen other things that could make someone strong. I like Killjoys partially because it showed good examples in that matter, like it showed that a simple mother can be strong.
Generally i think many SF would need more good and realistic characters.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
GTOM said:
Whatching Dark Matter 2nd season.

I don't know how you made it that far into the series. I found the series so trope-laden (tropey?) that I felt like I was just watching reruns of something else.

-Dave K
 
We forgot this one:

::time travel happens::

Person A: "Where are we?"

Person B: "No. The question isn't "where are we." The question is WHEN are we?"

Just once I want to see person B punched in the mouth for saying this. I'm not a fan of unnecessary violence, but in this case I believe it is strongly warranted.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Erloto, vela and Battlemage!
dkotschessaa said:
I'm not a fan of unnecessary violence,

This is necessary violence.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Battlemage!, CalcNerd and dkotschessaa
^^ Good stuff lol.Here's one that annoys me: colorful large computers and machines complete with unexplained flashing lights. Even data centers don't have those ridiculous flashing lights (although some have "hip" c, so why would more advanced computers and systems be bigger and more 1960s looking?Also, humanoid robots. Just seems unrealistic. The robots in Interstellar were perfect: completely not-human shaped, and instead shaped entirely for utility.

A figure in a white spacesuit with a dark visor stands on a rocky, barren plain, beside a tall rectangular block-shaped robot with panels and a small square display, and a small round robot nearby.
(or at least that was the image they wanted to project... I'm sure having block legs might not be the most efficient mode of transportation, but at least it wasn't a bi-pedal human looking thing. Yuck)
 
dkotschessaa said:
I don't know how you made it that far into the series. I found the series so trope-laden (tropey?) that I felt like I was just watching reruns of something else.

-Dave K

Oh, how i love this mentality... Based on this, most chapters of most books are similar to something, that someone made already...
 
GTOM said:
Oh, how i love this mentality... Based on this, most chapters of most books are similar to something, that someone made already...
Huh?
 
Vanadium 50 said:
I dislike the reverse, where aliens are all the same and only humans are diverse. I bet the Klingons have plumbers.

YESSSS.

Also, why hasn't this one been mentioned: STEAM. The use of steam in science fiction to denote "damage" to whatever structure you are in. Related to that are the twin ideas of breaking a nearby steam pipe to blind or distract your enemy and walking into or disappearing into a hallway obscured by steam.
 
rkolter said:
YESSSS.

Also, why hasn't this one been mentioned: STEAM. The use of steam in science fiction to denote "damage" to whatever structure you are in. Related to that are the twin ideas of breaking a nearby steam pipe to blind or distract your enemy and walking into or disappearing into a hallway obscured by steam.

If they use nuclear reactors, then they are ultimately still working with steam.
 
I hate the computer hacker stereotypes, as well as the nerdy-looking scientists.

Seriously, when's the last time you saw Hollywood portray a scientist who looked normal? Instead they're always socially retarded dweebs.

Puppet of a young man with short brown hair, large blue-framed glasses, and a light blue lab coat with a pen in the pocket, styled as a nerdy scientist.
 
sanman said:
I hate the computer hacker stereotypes, as well as the nerdy-looking scientists.

Seriously, when's the last time you saw Hollywood portray a scientist who looked normal? Instead they're always socially retarded dweebs.

Still of a marionette puppet with a smiling face, reddish-brown hair, large blue-framed glasses, and a light blue jacket with a pen in the pocket.
Painting of a shirtless man with open dark shirt reclining on a grassy hillside, one hand extended toward a yellow butterfly, with a dark storm cloud and sunset sky behind him. Signed Carreiva.
 
sanman said:
Seriously, when's the last time you saw Hollywood portray a scientist who looked normal? Instead they're always socially retarded dweebs.

I wonder if the "brainiac/nerd" stereotype wasn't more a product of the 1950s, at least in the U.S.?

At any rate the role of scientist like any other role (politician, lawyer, soldier, cop, housewife, etc.) can be caricatured or ridiculed; but also portrayed as sympathetic and/or admirable with humanizing character flaws; especially true when they are the protagonist or play a strong supporting role:

http://static7.comicvine.com/uploads/scale_medium/11118/111184078/5438929-9511668863-640_s.jpg

Still from a science fiction film showing a woman in a grey flight-style jumpsuit with a small headset microphone, looking intently at the camera in a dim, metallic interior.


Still of a man with a goatee in a grey tank top, raising a red and gold metallic gauntlet with a glowing white palm reactor toward the camera.


Photo of a woman with shoulder-length wavy blonde hair, wearing a sleeveless blue top with a dark smear on the shoulder, grimacing and looking to the side against a blurred green and grey background.


Still from a film showing an older man in a brown fedora, plaid shirt and canvas backpack straps, looking down at a young velociraptor-like dinosaur with its mouth open, in a misty green jungle.


Still from a film showing a middle-aged man with tousled hair in a dark blue jumpsuit with a patch reading NASA WEIR, standing before a window with blinds in a pale corridor.


A smiling woman with curly brown hair sits in forest undergrowth, hugging a young black gorilla close to her side while wearing a blue jacket and jeans.


Also for more non-nerdy women movie scientists in particular, see: http://www.ranker.com/list/best-female-scientists-in-film/anncasano
 
Last edited by a moderator:
It would be great to see a story about a mathematician that wasn't half insane, delusional, or manic depressive.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Erloto
dkotschessaa said:
It would be great to see a story about a mathematician that wasn't half insane, delusional, or manic depressive.

Probably only mathematicians (and physicists) would want to watch it. Small audience.
 
gleem said:
Probably only mathematicians (and physicists) would want to watch it. Small audience.

I mean, they could be charming, exciting, and dashing (like me) but do they have to be completely whackadoodle?

I'm going to film myself inverting a 10x10 matrix and send it to some film students. We'll see!

-Dave K
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Erloto
dkotschessaa said:
It would be great to see a story about a mathematician that wasn't half insane, delusional, or manic depressive.
Well, what about an engineer? Primer had a bunch of regular looking scientists.

Two men in dress shirts and ties sit side by side with drink cups and straws, looking across a dry field toward a self-storage facility with a sign reading Climate Controlled Self-Storage, Hitches, Moving Supplies, Boxes.


Yeah they wore ties the whole movie, but that was more about being professionals than engineers/scientists.
 
dkotschessaa said:
It would be great to see a story about a mathematician that wasn't half insane, delusional, or manic depressive.

This topic is about science fiction. Sane, lucid, emotionally stable mathematicians are fantasy creatures.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: dkotschessaa
I find it annoying that I notice in TNG that most of the time people turn left when exiting a room. :run:
 
rkolter said:
This topic is about science fiction. Sane, lucid, emotionally stable mathematicians are fantasy creatures.

Some are at least 2 out of 3...
 
dkotschessaa said:
Some are at least 2 out of 3...
I have one at my school who is all three, plus he's smooth with ladies.
 
Battlemage! said:
I have one at my school who is all three, plus he's smooth with ladies.

Some people can only be explained by reincarnation.
 
Battlemage! said:
I have one at my school who is all three, plus he's smooth with ladies.
Surely, he must be a closeted physicist.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: CalcNerd, dkotschessaa and (deleted member)
Honestly, the biggest sci-fi cliche that I absolutely hate is the notion that everything in a sci-fi story has to be sci-fi. Hydrospanners, laser drills, plasma-based can openers...no, okay?? The hammer, screwdriver, nail, and, yes, can opener will continue to be effective in the future. Humans have made a lot of tools - and a lot of improvement on those tools - but we've never outgrown the humble hammer. Why? Because we always have something we need to smack with a hammer. We always will. A screwdriver's batteries never run out mainly because it doesn't have any. Old solutions can still be the best solutions. Honestly, the over-teching of the world is a huge thorn in my hide when it comes to most sci-fi out there.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Yendor and dkotschessaa
SciFiWriterGuy said:
Honestly, the biggest sci-fi cliche that I absolutely hate is the notion that everything in a sci-fi story has to be sci-fi. Hydrospanners, laser drills, plasma-based can openers...no, okay?? The hammer, screwdriver, nail, and, yes, can opener will continue to be effective in the future. Humans have made a lot of tools - and a lot of improvement on those tools - but we've never outgrown the humble hammer. Why? Because we always have something we need to smack with a hammer. We always will. A screwdriver's batteries never run out mainly because it doesn't have any. Old solutions can still be the best solutions. Honestly, the over-teching of the world is a huge thorn in my hide when it comes to most sci-fi out there.
Great point! I might include video phones in this. Every single conversation. Why?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Yendor
dkotschessaa said:
Great point! I might include video phones in this. Every single conversation. Why?

Yes, exactly! With a normal phone, you can hand-signal someone in the room to create a pretext to get you off a never-ending call. That's a little hard to do when the other person can see you.
 
Bandersnatch said:
Surely, he must be a closeted physicist.
It's funny you say that. His specialty is partial differential equations, in his class he spent an inordinate amount of time explaining the physics of every piece of math he taught, and he is fond of saying the only department in the entire school that isn't a mess is the physics department.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Bandersnatch
john101 said:
I find it annoying that I notice in TNG that most of the time people turn left when exiting a room. :run:

I think I know why that bothers me. They are on a set. The camera is downstage and they exit the door (stage left) on the set and tend to walk towards the rear of the stage which means turning left outside the door. It breaks the scene for me and reminds me momentarily it's just a scene. iow that moment upstages the whole thing. I think that's what I find annoying.
 
john101 said:
I think I know why that bothers me. They are on a set.
Actually, it's a little-known Starfleet regulation that you always have to walk clockwise around the ship, which makes going to your next door neighbor in the other direction incredibly inefficient. o_O

Really, though...it was just sloppy directing.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Battlemage!