What scientist predicted the end of physics in the late 1800s?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter emimun
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Scientist
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around identifying a scientist from the late 1800s who predicted that physics was nearing its end, suggesting that only a few experiments remained to be solved, which would eventually lead to quantum mechanics and relativity.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant recalls a scientist from the late 1800s who claimed physics was nearing completion, leading to discussions about who this might be.
  • Another participant suggests Lord Kelvin as the scientist in question, referencing his pronouncements that were later proven false.
  • A different participant expresses a belief that the criticism of Kelvin is unfair, noting that he published work that hinted at the need for quantum mechanics and relativity.
  • Another participant proposes that the scientist might actually be Philip von Jolly, providing a link for further information.
  • There is a correction regarding the terminology used to describe the time period, emphasizing "1800s" instead of "Late '800".

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the identity of the scientist, with multiple competing views presented regarding whether it was Lord Kelvin or Philip von Jolly.

Contextual Notes

Participants express differing interpretations of historical figures and their contributions, with some noting the potential unfairness in the assessment of Kelvin's predictions.

emimun
Hi to you all!
I don't remember the name of a scientist of late '800, who said that we were arriving to the end of the physics, because just little experiments to solve, and then we would have known all about the physics. But that little experiments would have originated QM and relativity.

Who is this person?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Great! Very speed! Many many thanks!
 
1800s, not "Late '800"!
 
I always thought this was a bit unfair on Kelvin since the same year he published "Nineteenth-Century Clouds over the Dynamical Theory of Heat and Light" which (sort of) predicted relativity and QM (or at least the need for them).
 
HallsofIvy said:
1800s, not "Late '800"!

Sorry. Thanks!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
8K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 96 ·
4
Replies
96
Views
16K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
10K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K