What seismic design codes should I consider for my subsea structures?

  • Thread starter Thread starter aa2105
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Design Seismic
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on seismic design codes relevant to subsea structures in the oil and gas industry. Participants recommend the 2003 International Building Code (IBC) and the 1997 Uniform Building Code (UBC) as suitable references. The inquiry specifically seeks guidance on seismicity levels, with a threshold identified at MSK VII, above which detailed analysis is necessary. The conversation emphasizes the importance of adhering to established seismic design standards for structural integrity.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of seismic design principles
  • Familiarity with the 2003 International Building Code (IBC)
  • Knowledge of the 1997 Uniform Building Code (UBC)
  • Awareness of seismicity levels and their implications on structural analysis
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the specific requirements of the 2003 IBC for subsea structures
  • Examine the seismic design criteria outlined in the 1997 UBC
  • Investigate seismicity classification systems and their application in structural engineering
  • Explore additional seismic design codes from API relevant to offshore structures
USEFUL FOR

Structural engineers, seismic analysts, and professionals in the oil and gas sector involved in the design and assessment of subsea structures.

aa2105
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hi

I am looking for a "Western" seismic analysis design code? So something by BS, ISO, API, etc...

If there is one specific to the oil & gas industry and subsea strucutures, then great, but as this may not be available, any code on structural seismic design would do.

I essentially need to check which seismicity level below which analysis is not really needed - I think its above MSK VII but need confirmation...

Any help would be greatly appreciated! Thank you.

Adnan
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Look at 2003 IBC and 1997 UBC.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 133 ·
5
Replies
133
Views
11K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
817
Replies
81
Views
10K
  • · Replies 82 ·
3
Replies
82
Views
8K
Replies
10
Views
3K