swampwiz Messages 567 Reaction score 83 Thread starter May 5, 2020 #1 Was there a published report of exactly which stars which were supposed to be at position A but were observed at position B, etc.?
Was there a published report of exactly which stars which were supposed to be at position A but were observed at position B, etc.?
phinds Science Advisor Insights Author Gold Member Dearly Missed Messages 19,385 Reaction score 15,622 May 5, 2020 #2 Why would anyone bother? Do you think anyone doubts GR? EDIT: OOPS ... I missed the "1919"
Janus Staff Emeritus Science Advisor Homework Helper Insights Author Gold Member Messages 3,777 Reaction score 2,002 May 5, 2020 #3 On that date, the Sun was in Taurus. The catalogued stars near it were: HR1375 HR1403 67 Tauri 65 Tauri 69 Tauri 72 Tauri
On that date, the Sun was in Taurus. The catalogued stars near it were: HR1375 HR1403 67 Tauri 65 Tauri 69 Tauri 72 Tauri
phyzguy Science Advisor Messages 5,331 Reaction score 2,425 May 5, 2020 #4 See this paper: http://w.astro.berkeley.edu/~kalas/labs/documents/dyson1920.pdf
russ_watters Mentor Insights Author Messages 23,902 Reaction score 11,357 May 5, 2020 #5 phinds said: Why would anyone bother? Do you think anyone doubts GR? EDIT: OOPS ... I missed the "1919" Even still, NASA suggested You! should, and some did.
phinds said: Why would anyone bother? Do you think anyone doubts GR? EDIT: OOPS ... I missed the "1919" Even still, NASA suggested You! should, and some did.