kasse said:
So the electron actually DOES exist at two different places at the same time, but only when it's it's not being observed??
This is crazy, lol. If we observe each electron, will we then get a normal pattern instead of an interference pattern?
Thanks for a great link, btw
Yes, that's it. Of course, there are nuances about what "exists" means.

Sometimes it is explained that observing the path "kicked" the electron, which is why there is no interference pattern. But if you observe the path without "kicking" the electron, you still destroy the interference pattern.
Origin of quantum-mechanical complementarity probed by a `which-way' experiment in an atom interferometer
S. Dürr, T. Nonn, and G. Rempe
http://www.mpq.mpg.de/qdynamics/members/S.Duerr.html
After getting the path information and destroying the inteference pattern, you can even "erase" your knowledge of which path it took, and recover the interference pattern.
Quantum Erasure: Quantum Interference Revisited
Stephen P. Walborn, Marcelo O. Terra Cunha, Sebastião Pádua, Carlos H. Monken
http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0503073
[This is an introductory article.]
A double-slit quantum eraser
S. P. Walborn, M. O. Terra Cunha, S. Padua, C. H. Monken
http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0106078