What to choose: Physics vs geometry

  • Thread starter Thread starter A Dhingra
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Geometry Physics
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on a graduate student with an undergraduate degree in Physics from India, currently pursuing a master's in theoretical physics in the UK. They express a growing interest in geometry, particularly its connections to differential geometry and quantum field theory (QFT), but feel discouraged by the particle physics focus of their current courses. The student is contemplating whether to pursue a PhD in physics, ideally integrating geometry, or to switch to mathematics, despite lacking a strong pure math background. They face logistical challenges, including visa constraints and limited PhD opportunities, which complicate their decision-making process. Ultimately, advice is given to focus on physics, emphasizing the practical application of geometry in the field.
A Dhingra
Messages
211
Reaction score
1
Hi everyone,

I have an undergrad in Physics from an Indian University. And presently I am pursuing a masters in theoretical physics in UK.
Here I got a chance to explore courses in the math department. I took two courses in geometry : Differential geometry and Geometry of General Relativity. I found them hard in the beginning, but with time I have started to enjoy them a lot.
Other than these two, I took about 4 courses in QFT and found them okay. When I read about connection between ideas of differential geometry (Riemann Manifold) and Non-abelian Gauge theories, I was pretty excited to go on and study QFT from the prescriptive of Geometry. But unfortunately, the focus of these QFT courses was from the point of view of particle physicist, which I didn't seem to enjoy.
With the end of my degree I have to decide what field I must select for PhD. Like I said, I am a bit stuck between physics and geometry... The way I have found the working in the particle physics group I am a little discouraged to continue with physics, plus I have found a new interest in geometry. But I do not have much of a background in pure math, till date, I have done a little bit of real and complex analysis from the point of view of a physicist, thus it can't be even called pure math, and that's about it. I want to take a couple of courses in topology, algebraic geometry and things that deal with all this and discover if I find this more interesting as compared to physics.
Also, I have tried studying solid states, I found it better than QFT, and in fact, I have chosen my end of the year project in Solid states.
Now if I decide to stay in physics, I want to study it from the perspective of geometry, as much as I can. On the other hand, if I decide to switch from physics to maths, I have no clue how to go about it. Staying in physics sounds easier but I don't want to let go off geometry.
Just to describe that the situation is a bit complicated for me: I can't stay in UK for another masters (Visa constraints); I haven't got any PhD positions yet, in fact, I applied only for one position that too in Solid States; I can't do a PhD in India as a one year masters isn't acceptable there, and I can't switch from physics to maths there either; I am probably unqualified to take GRE maths for US. So, if anyone of you could suggest an option where I can study QFT from the perspective of Geometry (or Quanutm Gravity or String theory) and how should I decide which way to go?

Thank you for bearing with me..
I appreciate your help

Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If your ultimate goal is to make a living and not be dependent upon graduate fellowships and public support go with the physics, you will always be using the geometry in your work. Find an applied field where you can be productive, not just theoretical. String theory is great for coffeehouse conversation but it won’t pay the rent unless you are another Stephen Hawkins.
 
TL;DR: Jackson or Zangwill for Electrodynamics? Hi, I want to learn ultrafast optics and I am interested in condensed matter physics, ie using ultrafast optics in condensed matter systems. However, before I get onto ultrafast optics I need to improve my electrodynamics knowledge. Should I study Jackson or Zangwill for Electrodynamics? My level at the moment is Griffiths. Given my interest in ultrafast optics in condensed matter, I am not sure which book is better suited for me. If...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
699