What Type of Signal is x(t) in Parseval's Theorem?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jiho
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the interpretation of the signal x(t) in the context of Parseval's theorem, specifically questioning whether x(t) represents a voltage wave or a power wave. Participants explore the implications of these interpretations on the theorem's application.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the mathematical definition of x(t) and its potential representations, including voltage and power. Questions arise regarding the dimensional consistency of interpreting x(t) as power, particularly in relation to energy calculations.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants examining different interpretations of x(t) and their implications for Parseval's theorem. Some guidance has been offered regarding the usual interpretation of energy in relation to voltage or current signals, but no consensus has been reached on the nature of x(t) as a power signal.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the complexities of signal interpretation under the constraints of Parseval's theorem, particularly focusing on the existence of the Fourier transform and the implications of different signal types on energy calculations.

Jiho
Messages
20
Reaction score
4

Homework Statement


In parseval's theorem, what is type of x(t)?? I mean.. is this voltage wave? or power wave?

Homework Equations


upload_2019-1-14_13-51-29.png


The Attempt at a Solution

 

Attachments

  • upload_2019-1-14_13-51-29.png
    upload_2019-1-14_13-51-29.png
    3.9 KB · Views: 845
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2
Physics news on Phys.org
Mathematically, ##x(t)## can be any function ##x:\mathbb{R}\rightarrow\mathbb{C}## that is any complex valued function over the real line (or as a sub case any real valued function over the real line ##x:\mathbb{R}\rightarrow\mathbb{R}##) for which its continuous Fourier transform ##X(f)## exists . So it can be a function representing the (complex) voltage between two nodes of a circuit or the power between two nodes of a circuit.

However the usual interpretation of this theorem in signal analysis is that the two sides of the equation are just two different ways of computing the total energy of a signal ##x(t)## (a voltage or a current signal).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Jiho
you mentioned it doesn't matter that signal x(t) represents voltage or power. But I can't understand if x(t) represent power,
upload_2019-1-17_16-25-52.png
this equation doesn't make sense as I think. In my opinion, How can power^2 be just power?? Unit of dimension is not same as I know.
 

Attachments

  • upload_2019-1-17_16-23-45.png
    upload_2019-1-17_16-23-45.png
    1.5 KB · Views: 369
  • upload_2019-1-17_16-23-51.png
    upload_2019-1-17_16-23-51.png
    1.5 KB · Views: 372
  • upload_2019-1-17_16-25-52.png
    upload_2019-1-17_16-25-52.png
    1.5 KB · Views: 565
Yes I said that ##x(t)## can be any function for which the Fourier transform exists. However I also said that the usual interpretation is that of energy (the integrals in both sides represent energy) in the case ##x(t)## is a voltage or current signal. If ##x(t)## is a power signal then we can't give that usual interpretation of energy to this theorem.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Jiho

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K