I What types of forces are described in the standard minimal QED Lagrangian?

Click For Summary
In quantum electrodynamics (QED), the electrical component of the Lorentz Force is explained through the absorption and emission of photons by charged particles. The discussion raises questions about how the magnetic component of the Lorentz Force is similarly realized via photon activity, particularly regarding the velocity dependence of magnetic forces. It is noted that in quantum mechanics, the concept of "force" is not as straightforward as in classical mechanics, suggesting a more complex relationship between electric and magnetic fields. The standard minimal QED Lagrangian incorporates various forces, including the Lorentz force and those related to the electron's magnetic moment. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the nuanced understanding of electromagnetic interactions in the framework of QED.
LarryS
Gold Member
Messages
357
Reaction score
33
TL;DR
How is the magnetic part of the Lorentz Force realized in Q.E.D. via photon exchange, etc.?
In Q.E.D., the electrical part of the Lorentz Force between unlike and like charged particles is realized through the absorption and emission of photons.

How is the magnetic part of the Lorentz Force realized in Q.E.D. via photon activity?

As always, thanks in advance.
 
  • Like
Likes Delta2
Physics news on Phys.org
referframe said:
In Q.E.D., the electrical part of the Lorentz Force between unlike and like charged particles is realized through the absorption and emission of photons.

How is the magnetic part of the Lorentz Force realized in Q.E.D. via photon activity?
Um, by absorption and emission of (virtual) photons?

Why do you think that is not a sufficient explanation for the magnetic part but it is for the electric part? What's the difference?
 
  • Like
Likes bhobba, vanhees71 and Delta2
The Lorentz Force is basically Classical EM, right? In that world, the magnetic force has a velocity dependence. Is that velocity dependence in the Q.E.D. world still represented somehow, or is Q.E.D. only concerned with the net force on the particle?
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71
referframe said:
Is that velocity dependence in the Q.E.D. world still represented somehow, or is Q.E.D. only concerned with the net force on the particle?
"Force" isn't really a thing in QM. And this sentance seems to assume some dichotomy that isn't really there.
 
  • Like
Likes bhobba and vanhees71
Not sure which dichotomy you're referring to. Electrical vs Magnetic?
 
  • Like
Likes Delta2
referframe said:
Not sure which dichotomy you're referring to.
The one you posted and I quoted.
 
  • Sad
  • Like
Likes Motore and Delta2
The elegance of the relativistic description of electrodynamics (no matter whether classical or quantum) is that you don't need the artificial split of the electromagnetic field in electric and magnetic components anymore although this is of course important to understand the phenomenology, but the split indeed is frame dependent.

Writing down the standard minimal QED Lagrangian, i.e., a Dirac field minimally coupled to the em. field, contains all kinds of "forces", i.e., the standard Lorentz force ##q \vec{E}+q \vec{v} \times \vec{B}/c## as well as the "forces" due to the magnetic moment of the electron.

By chance we have a more formal answer in another recent thread:

https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/samalkhaiats-challenge-002.1006325/
 
  • Like
Likes bhobba, LarryS and PeroK

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
760
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 87 ·
3
Replies
87
Views
8K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K