MHB What was the probability of the Roosters winning their last game at home?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Bushy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Probability
AI Thread Summary
The Roosters have an 80% win rate at home and a 40% win rate away, with 55% of their games played at home this season. The overall probability of winning a game is calculated to be 62%. To determine the probability that their last win was at home, the conditional probability formula is applied. The intersection of winning at home and the total winning probability confirms the calculation. Thus, the probability that the Roosters' last win was at home is established through these statistical methods.
Bushy
Messages
40
Reaction score
0
The Roosters know that they will win 80% of their home matches and 40% of their away matches. This season’s fixture has the Roosters playing 55% of their games at home. Given that the Roosters won their last game, what was the probability that it was played at home? To find the probability of winning = 0.8x.55+0.4x0.45 = 0.62

To find if it was played at home 'given' a win then = the intersection of the two / 0.62
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Yes it is correct.
In this case, the conditional probability can be equated as:
$$\frac{P(winning-at-home)}{P(winning)}$$.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top