What was the significance of Lecompton, Kansas as the territorial capital?

  • Thread starter Thread starter dlgoff
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the significance of Lecompton, Kansas, particularly in relation to a reprint of The New York Times newspaper from February 20, 1858, presented during a Christmas tree exhibit. Participants express confusion regarding the relevance of the newspaper to the topic of Lecompton as the territorial capital. The conversation highlights a disconnect between the title and the content, with some members questioning the purpose of sharing the newspaper images. Ultimately, the discussion concludes without a clear understanding of the connection between the historical context and the exhibit.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the historical context of Lecompton, Kansas
  • Familiarity with the significance of The New York Times in historical documentation
  • Knowledge of the territorial history of Kansas
  • Basic comprehension of newspaper reproduction and archival practices
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the historical significance of Lecompton, Kansas as a territorial capital
  • Explore the role of The New York Times in 19th-century American journalism
  • Investigate the events surrounding the Kansas-Nebraska Act and its impact on Lecompton
  • Learn about archival methods for preserving historical newspapers and artifacts
USEFUL FOR

Historians, educators, students of American history, and anyone interested in the territorial history of Kansas and its cultural artifacts.

dlgoff
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
4,441
Reaction score
3,264
I went to the museum in Lecompton, Kansas today to see their Christmas tree exhibit and was given this reprint of The New York Times Newspaper:
Front:
front (November 23, 2012):
small IMG_3735.jpg

back (February 20,1858):
small IMG_3734.jpg
 

Attachments

  • small IMG_3735.jpg
    small IMG_3735.jpg
    32 KB · Views: 112
  • small IMG_3735.jpg
    small IMG_3735.jpg
    32 KB · Views: 110
Science news on Phys.org
I am not sure what I'm looking at.
 
DaveC426913 said:
I am not sure what I'm looking at.
It's a reprint of The New York Times Newspaper
 
DaveC426913 said:
I am not sure what I'm looking at.
I attached the full size images which might be easier to read.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_3735.JPG
    IMG_3735.JPG
    45.9 KB · Views: 118
  • IMG_3734.JPG
    IMG_3734.JPG
    63.6 KB · Views: 121
dlgoff said:
It's a reprint of The New York Times Newspaper
Yes, it is.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: dlgoff
DaveC426913 said:
Yes, it is.
So, you were able to read it okay?
 
dlgoff said:
So, you were able to read it okay?
Well, no.

I think perhaps a teaser would be in order - something that might pique a potential reader's curiosity and draw them in.
 
DaveC426913 said:
Well, no.

I think perhaps a teaser would be in order - something that might pique a potential reader's curiosity and draw them in.
I really don't know what you mean.
 
PF automatically downsizes the images. To read the full sized versions, you'll either need to post them elsewhere and link to them, or alternatively, type in the text.
 
  • #10
dlgoff said:
I really don't know what you mean.
  1. The title contains three words that, while I recognize, I'm not used to seeing together, and make no sense to me. They do not illuminate the subject of the thread, except for Kansas, but then the thread seems to also have something to do with Christmas.
  2. The body of the thread contains photos of New York Times newspaper pages, which is a complete non sequitur, though they too reference Kansas.
None of that explains why you've presented this for us to read.
 
  • #11
DaveC426913 said:
  1. The title contains three words that, while I recognize, I'm not used to seeing together, and make no sense to me. They do not illuminate the subject of the thread, except for Kansas, but then the thread seems to also have something to do with Christmas.
  2. The body of the thread contains photos of New York Times newspaper pages, which is a complete non sequitur, though they too reference Kansas.
None of that explains why you've presented this for us to read.
Sorry you don't understand why I posted the reproduction that was given to me while visiting the Christmas tree exhibit. Discussion Ended.
 
  • #12
Sorry about that. I don't mean to be a stinker.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 67 ·
3
Replies
67
Views
16K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 287 ·
10
Replies
287
Views
27K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
6K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K