What was the speed of Sputnik I at its perigee?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion centers around calculating the speed of Sputnik I at its perigee, given its orbital parameters including perigee and apogee distances, the mass of Earth, and the gravitational constant. The problem involves concepts from orbital mechanics and conservation laws.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the use of conservation of energy and angular momentum to relate the speeds at perigee and apogee. There are attempts to derive equations that connect these variables, with some questioning how to express angular momentum and energy conservation without knowing one of the speeds.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing hints and guidance on using conservation laws. There are multiple interpretations being explored regarding the relationships between the variables involved, particularly concerning the definitions and roles of energy and angular momentum in the context of elliptical orbits.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express urgency due to impending exams, which may influence the depth of their inquiries and the clarity of their understanding. There is also confusion regarding the use of certain terms, such as "k" for spring constant, which some participants argue is not applicable in this gravitational context.

ChloeYip
Messages
93
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Sputnik I was launched into orbit around Earth in 1957. It had a perigee (the closest approach to
Earth, measured from Earth's center) of 6.81 × 106 m and an apogee (the furthest point from
Earth's center) of 7.53 × 106 m. What was its speed when it was at its perigee? The mass of Earth
is 5.97 × 1024 kg and G = 6.67 × 10- 11 N ∙ m2/kg2

Homework Equations


F=GMm/r2 F=mv2/r

The Attempt at a Solution


As energy is also conserved. mv(for perigee)/2-GMm/7.53*106=mv(for apogee)/2-GMm/6.81*106
But how can I find v(for apogee)? Thus v(for perigee)?
I can't find the MC answer which is 7840m/sSimilar thread:
https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/orbit-around-the-earth.867945/
http://www.enotes.com/homework-help/sputnik-was-launched-into-orbit-around-earth-1957-566404

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There's another conservation law that will help here.
 
Angular momentum? L=rp=rmv
But still i need to find v for apogee... ehich i don't know how to get the answer avoiding this unknown variable...
 
Yes, angular momentum is conserved over the whole orbit. What does that tell you about the angular momentum at both apogee and perigee? Can you express that as an equation?
 
Can you determine the period of the orbit from what you are given? And if so, what does that give you?
 
gneill said:
Yes, angular momentum is conserved over the whole orbit. What does that tell you about the angular momentum at both apogee and perigee? Can you express that as an equation?

(a=apogee,p=perigee,r=radius,v=velosity)
ra x va = rp x vp
Right? Without vp, how to find va?
 
Janus said:
Can you determine the period of the orbit from what you are given? And if so, what does that give you?
T=2(pi)/(angular velosity) = 2(pi)r/(average v)?
 
ChloeYip said:
(a=apogee,p=perigee,r=radius,v=velosity)
ra x va = rp x vp
Right? Without vp, how to find va?
This gives you one relationship between va and vp. Energy conservation gives you another. Two equations, two unknowns.
 
ChloeYip said:
T=2(pi)/(angular velosity) = 2(pi)r/v?
Do you agree with this?
What is r and what is v?
Thanks
 
  • #10
ChloeYip said:
Do you agree with this?
What is r and what is v?
Thanks
If the orbit were circular then I'd agree. But the velocity and radius both vary over time for an elliptical orbit.

Use the conservation laws: energy and angular momentum.
 
  • #11
ChloeYip said:
Do you agree with this?
What is r and what is v?
Thanks
Not quite what I was looking for. There is a fairly direct way to get the answer to the problem, but it assumes some knowledge of the nature of orbits. I was trying to gauge just how much you knew about orbits in order to know in what direction to lead you in.
 
  • #12
gneill said:
Use the conservation laws: energy and angular momentum.
Angular momentum: Rmva=rmvp
Energy: 0.5ka^2 ; 0.5mv^2; -gMm/r => how should i arrange them?
Thanks

I have only little time left before my rxam is coming... hope you can tell me the sooner the better for me to try and understand them... thank you very much.
 
  • #13
ChloeYip said:
Angular momentum: Rmva=rmvp
Okay. Note that the m's can cancel.
Energy: 0.5ka^2 ; 0.5mv^2; -gMm/r => how should i arrange them?
Apply energy conservation for the two orbit locations.
 
  • #14
I know i should use energy conservation... but how to arrange them? If 0.5k(ap)^2+0.5m(vp)^2+gMm/r=0.5K(aa)^2+0.5m(va)^2+GMm/r
How come there are so many variable?! Am i having something wrong?
So how can i arrange them?
Thanks...

(Only little time left from test...)
 
  • #15
ChloeYip said:
I know i should use energy conservation... but how to arrange them? If 0.5k(ap)^2+0.5m(vp)^2+gMm/r=0.5K(aa)^2+0.5m(va)^2+GMm/r
How come there are so many variable?! Am i having something wrong?
I don't know what your "k" terms are meant to represent. What type of energy do they correspond to? What is k?

You need to get your signs right for the gravitational potential energy. Gravitational potential energy in this context takes its reference point at infinite distance, so its sign is always negative.

You have two given locations, apogee and perigee, for which you have separate orbit radii. Be sure to identify them in your equation with separate variable names.
 
  • #16
K is spring constant, as such the planet is oscillating like a spring
It is correspond to elastic potential energy
 
  • #17
ChloeYip said:
K is spring constant, as such the planet is oscillating like a spring
It is correspond to elastic potential energy
There's no spring here. The "spring" action of the orbit is accounted for by the trading of gravitational potential energy and kinetic energy.
 
  • #18
ChloeYip said:
K is spring constant, as such the planet is oscillating like a spring
It is correspond to elastic potential energy
To the extent that the satellite oscillates in its orbit, it is a result of the gravitational attraction term you already have in the equation, not from some mysterious piece of elastic tethering it to Baikonur.
Besides, gravitation follows an inverse square law of attraction, while elastic follows a linear law.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ChloeYip
  • #19
haruspex said:
To the extent that the satellite oscillates in its orbit, it is a result of the gravitational attraction term you already have in the equation, not from some mysterious piece of elastic tethering it to Baikonur.
Besides, gravitation follows an inverse square law of attraction, while elastic follows a linear law.

Thank you very much.
I can find the answer now.
 

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
22K