What Will a Graph of Thickness vs. Beta Particle Rate Look Like?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dead Fish
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Radioactivity
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on the relationship between the thickness of aluminum and the rate of beta particles passing through it. The user hypothesizes that the graph of thickness versus beta particle rate will exhibit a negative linear gradient, indicating a decrease in rate with increased thickness. The user also inquires about the benefits of plotting logarithmic values for thickness and rate, suggesting that this may yield a more accurate calibration graph. Additionally, the user seeks advice on selecting a radioactive material with a suitable half-life for consistent measurements, considering Iodine-113 and the implications of its decay rate.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of beta radiation and its properties
  • Familiarity with graphing techniques and linear vs. exponential relationships
  • Knowledge of radioactive decay and half-life concepts
  • Basic grasp of calibration methods in experimental physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the application of logarithmic scales in scientific graphing
  • Study the properties and safety considerations of Iodine-113 in experiments
  • Learn about the principles of Bethes formula and its relevance to stopping power
  • Investigate the impact of half-life on the stability of radioactive materials in experiments
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for physics students, experimental researchers, and educators involved in radioactivity studies, particularly those focusing on beta radiation and calibration techniques in experimental setups.

Dead Fish
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
URGENT HELP Question About Radioactivity

Im doing some Coursework in for... tomorow :S I know my own fault! but I've only just come across the Problem and I've been doing it for the last few Days.
Im designing an experiment Investigating the effect of Thickness of Aluminium against the Rate of Beta Particles passing through, so that people can find how thick it is based on the rate. I've desiged most of it, just a few queries but quite important ones!

-Im wondering what a graph of Thickness/Rate would actually look like... Exponential or Linear? I think it would be a negative linear gradient decreasing rate against increasing thickness.

-Should I be plotting a lg Thickness/lg Rate? and what effect on the graph does plotting logs do? why do you do it? I've come across Gravity/Distance from Centre which is Exp. Graph but log one was linear which may give me a better graph for calibrating the thickness against rate as i need a calibration graph so people can measure thickness with the rate.

-Finally, I know that Radioactivity decays with time... i do know something! heh. Should i be using a radioactive material with a long half life so the Rate of Beta Particles will not differ over time, OR does the rate stay the same?
Ive found Iodine 113 which i consider a perticularly safe material because its used in hospitals ect. and only 8day half life. but i figure activity will be changing every day so it needs to be callibrated almost every day to get accurate readings! not good! so i figured i need a fairly long half life (100's Years) so that the rate chages a little.

Sorry About My Bad Communicationaly Skills! :frown: Hope You can Help me! Ask be if Nothing makes Sense!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Bethes formula : stopping power, familiar? [there are tow of them, one for heavy charged, and one for electrons]

Also with increasing life time, you will not get so many Beta particles / time.. otherwise you need a big samle. Say that you want 1000 decays / second, then you can calculate how much you need of every element if you know the elements half life.
 
Last edited:
Bethes formula? Mass Stopping Power... haven't come across this, what is it?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K