Discussion Overview
The discussion revolves around how to refer to the decade from 2000 to 2009, exploring various proposed names and the implications of naming conventions. Participants reflect on historical naming patterns, cultural references, and personal anecdotes related to the decade.
Discussion Character
- Debate/contested
- Conceptual clarification
- Meta-discussion
Main Points Raised
- Some participants suggest the decade could be referred to as "the oughts," similar to previous naming conventions.
- Others propose humorous names like "Oh 0s," "Dumb0s," and "Cheeri0s," indicating a lighthearted approach to the topic.
- One participant mentions that Time magazine referred to the decade in a specific way, which has been echoed by others.
- There are references to significant events during the decade, such as 9/11 and natural disasters, which some argue have shaped the perception of the decade.
- Some participants express a desire to avoid naming the decade altogether, suggesting it might be better left unmentioned.
- There is a discussion about the absence of a year zero and how this affects the naming of decades, with some emphasizing the importance of starting from year one.
- One participant reflects on generational experiences and suggests that the decade could be characterized as the "entitlement decade" due to changes in access to products and services.
Areas of Agreement / Disagreement
Participants do not reach a consensus on a single name for the decade, with multiple competing views and humorous suggestions remaining throughout the discussion.
Contextual Notes
Some participants highlight the complexity of naming conventions and the influence of cultural and historical events on perceptions of the decade, indicating that these factors may complicate agreement on a name.