Gravity at the Event Horizon of a Black Hole

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the acceleration due to gravity at the Event Horizon of a black hole, clarifying that traditional concepts of gravity do not apply. It establishes that the gravitational field at the Event Horizon is strong enough to prevent light from escaping, and the proper acceleration required to hover increases infinitely as one approaches the Event Horizon. The conversation emphasizes that no object can remain at rest at this boundary, rendering the measurement of acceleration impossible. Furthermore, claims regarding infinite acceleration and mass are dismissed as incorrect in the context of finite mass black holes.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of general relativity and black hole physics
  • Familiarity with concepts of proper acceleration and reference frames
  • Knowledge of gravitational fields and their effects on light
  • Basic principles of tidal forces in gravitational fields
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the concept of Event Horizons in black hole physics
  • Study the implications of general relativity on gravitational acceleration
  • Explore the relationship between mass and gravitational fields in black holes
  • Examine peer-reviewed literature on black hole dynamics and proper acceleration
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, physicists, and students of astrophysics interested in the mechanics of black holes and the nature of gravity at extreme conditions.

RobertsMrtn
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
TL;DR
The gravitational field of a Black Hole at the Event Horizon would have to be of sufficient strength to prevent light from escaping. The strength of the field would have to be the same for any Black Hole regardless of size. What would be the acceleration due to gravity at this point?
Acceleration due to gravity at the Event Horizon of a Black Hole.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Not a question that makes sense, unfortunately. What Newton would call "the acceleration due to gravity", Einstein would call "the proper acceleration required to hover at constant radius". You can't hover at the event horizon (it isn't even really a place in the ordinary sense of the word - it's an outgoing null surface) so your question is based on an invalid premise.
 
Last edited:
RobertsMrtn said:
Summary:: The gravitational field of a Black Hole at the Event Horizon would have to be of sufficient strength to prevent light from escaping. The strength of the field would have to be the same for any Black Hole regardless of size. What would be the acceleration due to gravity at this point?

Acceleration due to gravity at the Event Horizon of a Black Hole.

To expand on what @Ibix said. If an object is falling to Earth, then it experiences no force. An object sitting on the surface of the Earth, however, experiences an upward force from the surface preventing it falling any further. The acceleration due to gravity, therefore, is the acceleration of a falling object in the reference frame of something at rest relative to the surface of the Earth. It's really the proper acceleration of the object on the surface that is being measured!

The same is true when an object falls into a black hole. It experiences no force (except so-called tidal forces). It has no intrinsic or proper acceleration. Its acceleration could be measured by an object at rest relative to the black hole. As one gets closer to the black hole, the force and proper acceleration required to remain at rest relative to the black hole increases without limit. Again, it is that acceleration that is really being measured. And, at the event horizon itself, it is impossible for an object to remain at rest on the horizon, so there is no way to measure an acceleration of an infalling object.
 
PeroK said:
As one gets closer to the black hole, the force and proper acceleration required to remain at rest relative to the black hole increases without limit.
I would say that this is the direct answer to @RobertsMrtn’s question.
 
Thank you for your reply. According to my calculations, the acceleration would have to be infinite which would require an infinite mass. See my paper here. <personal theory link deleted>
 
RobertsMrtn said:
the acceleration would have to be infinite

More precisely, the proper acceleration required to maintain a constant altitude above the horizon increases without bound as the altitude goes to zero. Yes, this is well known.

RobertsMrtn said:
which would require an infinite mass

This, however, is wrong. The above statement about the acceleration is true for any black hole of any finite mass.

RobertsMrtn said:
See my paper here.

Your paper is not peer-reviewed, and such papers are generally not considered valid references for discussion here at PF. Based on a quick read through of your paper, that policy is certainly justified in this particular case.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Demystifier
RobertsMrtn said:
According to my calculations

Since you evidently did not start this thread to actually get an answer to your question or to understand the correct answer, this thread is closed.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
8K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
5K
  • · Replies 73 ·
3
Replies
73
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
738
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
913
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K