What would this open set in R look like?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter lunde
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Set
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the properties of an open set in the context of well-ordering the real numbers and the implications of such a construction. Participants explore the nature of the set defined by singleton sets of odd numbers and the conditions under which it may be considered open or closed within the topology of real numbers.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes a construction of a set U using singleton sets of odd numbers in a well-ordering of the real numbers, suggesting that U is closed and thus its complement is open.
  • Another participant questions the clarity of the construction and suggests that U might actually be the empty set, raising concerns about the treatment of infinite ordinals.
  • A different participant notes that well-ordering the reals requires the axiom of choice, implying that visualizing the set is problematic.
  • One participant emphasizes that while any set can be well-ordered, this does not guarantee the existence of a "next" number for any given number in uncountable sets like the reals.
  • Another participant clarifies that every ordinal has a successor, but limit ordinals do not have a predecessor, which adds complexity to the discussion of well-ordering.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the implications of well-ordering the reals, the nature of the set U, and the existence of successors in the context of ordinals. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing perspectives presented.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations regarding the assumptions made about well-ordering and the implications of the axiom of choice. The discussion also highlights the complexity of dealing with infinite ordinals and the properties of countable versus uncountable sets.

lunde
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
Well order the real numbers, let {a_n}_{n \in S_{\Omega} } be the the singleton sets of odd numbers in the well order (i.e. skip a number, grab a number, skip a number, grab a number). Since the real numbers are T_1 then singleton sets are closed. \mathbb{R} as a topological space is closed by definition. Let U := \mathbb{R} \bigcap_{n \in S_{\omega} } {a_n} . Then U is closed and hence \mathbb{R} \backslash U is open.

Is my logic correct here? It just seemed strange to me that this set would be open. Does anyone know what this set would look like? Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your construction is somewhat confusing, and in my best guess at your intent, U is the empty set.


Incidentally, what are you doing about infinite ordinals? I suppose you could decree limit ordinals to be even, and extend the notion of being even/odd from there.
 
As a well ordening of the reals requires the axiom of choice, I don't think one could imagine how the set looks like.
 
More importantly, while any set can be "well ordered", that does NOT imply that, given one number, there exist a "next" number. That is only possible for "countable" sets and the real numbers are not countable.

You could ask this question of the rational numbers but then I think that Landau's comment is valid.
 
HallsofIvy said:
More importantly, while any set can be "well ordered", that does NOT imply that, given one number, there exist a "next" number.
That one's guaranteed -- every ordinal has a successor. It's the reverse that can fail: limit ordinals do not have a predecessor.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
10K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K