What would you do if you were in my situation?

  • Thread starter faizlo
  • Start date
In summary, Faizlo is an experienced particle physicist who has not been able to find a job in his field. He is considering getting a Master's or another PhD in Engineering or another field to help him find a job. He is also considering moving to another country.
  • #1
faizlo
6
0
What would you do if you were in my situation!?

Hi all,

This might be a tough question indeed.

I am an international student who came to the US to do his PhD in Experimental Particle Physics, my childhood love and passion.

I have taken part in one of the most important discoveries in particle physics recently, the discovery of the Higgs Boson.

Well, as most newly graduated PhD students or graduating ones, I have been looking for a job as a faculty at any college or university but to no avail. A postdoc is not an option, because statistics show that one needs two to three postdocs to finally land as an assistant professor at some university. I am not young, I am almost 37. Then, not so long ago, the political situation back home is too bad to even think of going back now with my wife and kids (I have 2 kids) and I have been delaying my graduation to the point that I cannot do this again. Even without these troubles, it is still very hard to find a position for a particle physicist back home.
I have not thought about job prospects before I do my PhD, simply I wanted to do what I loved most, research.

I still cannot find a job, and teaching, which I am/was excellent at, I could not demonstrate myself as a good TA in my university because our work needed me to be stationed at the experiment I worked for, and so have always worked as an RA, and so no good recommendations from my department as a good teacher can be achieved!

I have been thinking about this for sometime and when I tested the market and knew how difficult it is to find a job, I took courses in Medical Physics so I can make the transition; but I was lucky enough to know that AAPM have changed their regulations and I won't be able to work as a medical physicist unless I have a degree in Medical Physics (and the irony is, most of medical physicists I know are either particle or nuclear physics graduates!)

Now, after I formally graduate, I will have the option to stay here, in the US, for a while on an OPT program, but I can't stay here for long, since I have no financial resources to help me stay for more than few months.
My questions now are:
- Were I wrong when I decided to go to Particle Physics, and Physics in general?
- Is it crazy to think of getting another degree (Master or another PhD) in Engineering or another field that may help me find a job in industry? That's another 2 or 5 years of hard work!
-What else one can do, besides getting a PhD and working in a tough field to find a bill-paying job?

Thanks,

~faizlo
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
I'd look outside my field. You are qualified for any job requiring a BS or a BS in physics. What are you good at? If you can do math, especially statistics, there are many jobs requiring that. If you can program, there are always jobs doing that. Then you can look for jobs where those primary skills are enhanced by a knowledge of particle physics.

Cast a wider net. Use your school's job counseling services to help you expand your thinking. Read What Color is Your Parachute or look at Bolles' web site for more and better ideas.
 
  • #3
On the medical physics side of things - if you really are interested in that route - you have a couple of options. There are a couple of programs that allow PhDs to complete their coursework in about 8 months and award you an accredited diploma that the ABR will recognize. This, coupled with a PhD in physics, will put you on par with current medical physics PhD graduates for residencies. This of course is costly as, the courses do not provide financial support. The other option is to enroll in a full medical physics MSc... which has the advantage of being funded (in some programs anyway). I know a few people who've been in a similar situation as yourself and have had success both ways. The major issue is that you're talking another few years of your life, financial investment, an no guarantee that you'll get a residency.
 
  • #4
I know Drexel University is looking for a particle person.

http://www.drexel.edu/physics/contact/jobs/

Not sure if that is applicable to you, I have little knowledge of particle stuff, but I hope it helps.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #5
It will be very difficult for you to find a job as a faculty member without having done a postdoc.
 
  • #6
Do you have teaching experience? Can you get letters of recommendation based on that, even if it isn't at your current university?

If you are interested in moving into a mainly teaching-oriented career, every year there are some temporary full-time positions ("visiting assistant professor" if you have finished your PhD, "instructor" if you have not) available around the country at small colleges, for replacing professors who are on sabbatical. Most application deadlines are late this year or early next year, for positions that start next fall. Some such positions also become available in late spring when faculty members decide to leave their current position at the end of the academic year.

One or two of those positions (assuming they lead to good recommendations) would give you a chance at a tenure-track teaching position. Of course, there's a lot of competition even for these positions, but at least they give you an additional route besides research-oriented postdocs.

For any kind of academic position (teaching or research), I think you'll have to deal with temporary positions after the Ph.D., before landing a tenure-track position.

There are also adjunct (part-time) teaching positions, but it's hard to support a family on those, unless your wife also works.
 
Last edited:
  • #7
Thank you all for replying.
So, do you think it is of no use to think of another degree in Engineering or industry related field?
Teaching jobs are fine with me, I wish I can find one, I have applied but they call back that they had to take it back because of funding issues. I am still trying, though, and I wish I can find one.

Medical Physics is very time consuming and still one will have to fight for a residency. And yes, it costs tons of money...

I hate to say this, but I feel doing basic research is useless these days.
 

1. What is your approach to problem-solving?

I believe in using a systematic and evidence-based approach to problem-solving. This involves identifying the problem, gathering relevant data and information, analyzing the data, and coming up with a solution that is supported by evidence and logical reasoning.

2. How do you handle unexpected challenges in your research?

As a scientist, I know that unexpected challenges are a normal part of the research process. I handle them by remaining calm and focused, brainstorming potential solutions, and seeking advice from colleagues or experts in the field. I also believe in continuously learning and adapting my methods to overcome any challenges that may arise.

3. How do you ensure the validity and reliability of your findings?

To ensure the validity and reliability of my findings, I follow established scientific methods and protocols. This includes using appropriate controls, replicating experiments, and conducting thorough data analysis. I also make sure to document my methods and findings accurately to allow for reproducibility and transparency.

4. How do you communicate your research findings to others?

I believe in communicating my research findings in a clear, concise, and accurate manner. This involves using appropriate scientific language, providing relevant visual aids such as graphs or charts, and seeking feedback from colleagues or peers. I also make sure to present my findings in a way that is understandable to non-scientific audiences.

5. How do you handle conflicting results in your research?

Conflicting results are a common occurrence in scientific research. To handle them, I carefully examine the data and methodology used in the conflicting studies to identify any potential biases or flaws. I also consider alternative explanations and seek input from other experts in the field. Ultimately, I strive to draw conclusions that are supported by the weight of evidence.

Similar threads

  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • STEM Academic Advising
2
Replies
53
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
882
  • STEM Academic Advising
2
Replies
37
Views
2K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
29
Views
511
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • STEM Academic Advising
2
Replies
50
Views
4K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
1
Views
581
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
17
Views
1K
Back
Top