Discussion Overview
The discussion revolves around the terminology used for equations that do not fit the definition of an eigenvalue problem, specifically comparing the forms ##L[\phi] = M[\phi]## and ##L[\phi] = M##. Participants explore the nature of these equations, particularly in the context of linear operators and differential equations.
Discussion Character
- Debate/contested
- Technical explanation
- Conceptual clarification
Main Points Raised
- Some participants suggest that the equation ##L[\phi] = M## does not have a specific name and argue that it is not an eigenvalue problem.
- Others propose that the equation ##Ax = b## is simply referred to as a "linear equation" or an "inhomogeneous system of linear equations," depending on the context.
- A participant mentions that in functional analysis, non-eigenvalues can be referred to as resolvents under certain conditions, but this does not imply a specific problem name.
- There is a humorous analogy made comparing non-eigenvalues to non-zebras, suggesting that there is no special terminology for things that are not eigenvalues.
- Some participants express uncertainty about the formal naming of equations that do not fall under the eigenvalue category, indicating that the terminology may vary based on context.
Areas of Agreement / Disagreement
Participants generally do not agree on a specific term for non-eigenvalue problems, with multiple competing views on how to classify such equations. The discussion remains unresolved regarding a universally accepted terminology.
Contextual Notes
Participants note that the classification of equations may depend on the specific mathematical context, such as whether the operators are linear or if they pertain to differential equations.