What's being curved, when mass bends the spacetime continuum?

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the nature of spacetime and what it means for it to be "curved" by mass. Participants express confusion about the fundamental essence of spacetime, questioning whether it is merely a mathematical construct or something more tangible. The conversation highlights the limitations of using analogies, such as rubber sheets, to represent spacetime, as these models do not address its true nature. There is a consensus that while spacetime can be described mathematically, its physical reality remains elusive and difficult to define. Ultimately, the dialogue reflects a fascination with the complexities of spacetime and the ongoing quest for understanding in physics.
  • #61


Hi.

Oh, we have very good definition for that. All of 64 Riemann curvature tensor components vanish simultaneously? Then space is flat at that point. Some of Riemann curvature tensor components are different than zero? Sorry, not flat. Einstein was poetic that day. Too much gulash, I guess. Heh, gulash is cooked with - wine!

Cheers.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #62
A.T. said:
But the geometry of spacetime is also described by a field. Newtons gravitation is a vector field. Einsteins gravitation is a tensor field:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Field_(physics )

Which tensor field in GR would you call the gravitational field?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #63


Hi.

Heh, it depends on nomenclature... For instance, in metric \delta s^2 = \left(1+2V(r)\right)\delta t^2-\frac{\delta r^2}{1+2V(r)}-r^2 \delta \Omega^2 metric tensor components are fields describing gravity... Strictly speaking, there is no exterior field for gravity. This is the very condition for gravity: E_{\mu \nu}=0. Nothing on the right-hand side. On the other hand... What is 1+2V(r) then?... It's some field, right? So... I'm becoming a bit bored of this now.

Cheers.
 
  • #64


My simplistic understanding is that to get from Hither to Yon, you have to go a certain way. The rule for light is it has to get there the fastest way, not the straightest path. Since almost always they are the same, it's confusing when they diverge.

Another is like saying - how come the way to Mecca is off to the northeast for local Muslim folks? Mecca's actually at a slightly lower latitude to where I live, but not much. Ought to be SOUTHeast, by my guess. What is the thing that causes the Qibla (the way to Mecca) to curve? That's a fallacious question.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
6K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
469
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K