What's Beyond the Universe? Question Analysis

  • Thread starter Thread starter Aquw
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around philosophical and theoretical questions regarding the nature of the universe, particularly what lies beyond it, the concept of time, and the possibility of time travel. Participants explore these ideas through various lenses, including cosmology, philosophy, and personal beliefs.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that if the universe is finite, there must be something outside it, while others argue this is a logical fallacy, suggesting a finite universe can exist without an edge or boundary.
  • One participant suggests that if one were outside the universe, they might witness the Big Bang and universal expansion, implying a theoretical perspective on what lies beyond.
  • There is a contention regarding the nature of time, with some asserting that motion requires time, while others question whether time exists in a universe devoid of matter or energy.
  • Some participants express the belief that time is a man-made construct, while others challenge this notion, asking for reasons why it might be incorrect.
  • The possibility of time travel is discussed, with references to manipulating time through motion and gravity, particularly near massive objects like black holes.
  • Philosophical questions are raised about the existence of "nothingness" and whether it is possible to conceive of a universe without an origin yet with a finite age.
  • Several participants emphasize that discussions about what lies beyond the universe often delve into philosophical territory rather than scientific cosmology.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the nature of the universe and time, with no consensus reached. Disagreements persist regarding the existence of something outside the universe and the nature of time.

Contextual Notes

Some statements reflect personal beliefs and philosophical interpretations rather than established scientific consensus. The discussion includes speculative ideas about the relationship between time, motion, and the concept of nothingness.

  • #31
TalonD said:
and to think, we used to believe the Earth was flat and if you traveled far enough you would fall off the edge...

I have always found that people have a difficult time wraping the grey matter around the concept of 'nothingness'. Perhaps 'infinity' can be just as difficult. But when you stop trying to picture things in your mind and just accept the concept then it becomes easier with things that are so counter intuitive.

Since the subject of time was brought up...

I have a question or lots of questions about time. So help me understand it a bit. I know that it is considered a dimension which is somewhat interchangeable with the other 3 dimensions of space from GR. so that by changeing the speed at which you move through space, you change your position in time relative to a stationary observer. but... I can imagine a universe which contains no matter or energy, would there be a such thing as time in that uninverse? are we required to have motion in order to have time? If so then is there an equivilance of time and motion or of time and energy, and if so then could time be considered to have a wave particle duality? could we envision some experiment where time waves could be detected?


...if there is gray matter, is there gray energy? jk ;)

Get it out of your head that time is some THING. In order for time to exist it simply needs to be acknowledge, it's what we use to measure, it's just as good as a ruler, and nothing more, if you have no concept of time, then there is no time, simple events.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Aquw said:
Question 1- what's beyond the Universe?

If the universe if finite, there must be something outside it, right? I've heard many people say "it's just time- and no space", but how can this be?

Well, the way that i see this is that If, the universe is finite then a location of this space must exist, i.e. your house on the planet, you can't hold a location of space if there isn't sufficient space in which to hold it, thus the universe is finite in which it is held in a location, but this location in which holds the prior location of the location must always be finite and therefore the universe must be finite which, logically is impossible (i.e. you MUST have space to hold space). assuming the universe is infinite, you would need to assume that an infinite amount of space exists to hold the infinite(or continuously expanding) universe, which also will turn up impossible (this is all assuming that the universe isn't just a "4-D" Space-time continuum which many theories suggest - which seems slightly un-real, but the only possibility) so in turn there is nothing beyond the universe, for the universe doesn't exist at all. :frown: which obviously it does, but think about it. :confused:


-- Grog
 
  • #33
There is an old saying that sems apt to many of the posts on this forum and I am no exception. " a wise man knows not, and knows that he knows not. A fool knows not and knows not that he knows not"

and oh by the way, time is a real thing as much as any of the other three spatial dimensions.

nuf said
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
830
High School The M paradox
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
716
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
3K
  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
6K
Replies
18
Views
2K