What's New in the PF Username Game Part III?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Gokul43201
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Game Part iii
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The thread revolves around a game where participants create and solve cryptic clues related to the usernames of members on Physics Forums. The discussion includes various levels of difficulty in the clues, with participants engaging in both guessing and explaining their reasoning behind the answers. The scope is primarily recreational and community-oriented, focusing on wordplay and lateral thinking.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Participants propose various cryptic clues for usernames, such as "in much ado, calculus lives" and "mini rod, twisted."
  • Some participants successfully identify usernames and provide explanations, like "kurdt" from "bad turk with half a grand" and "hypatia" from "\sqrt{adj^2+opp^2}~@~Iowa."
  • There are discussions about the difficulty of the clues, with some participants expressing feelings of being outclassed or finding the game challenging.
  • Multiple participants suggest different interpretations or solutions for the clues, leading to a mix of correct and incorrect guesses.
  • Some clues remain unsolved, indicating ongoing exploration and engagement with the game.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the enjoyment of the game and the challenge it presents, but there are multiple competing views on the solutions to the clues, with no consensus reached on all answers.

Contextual Notes

Some clues may depend on specific knowledge of usernames or wordplay techniques, and there are unresolved interpretations of certain clues that could lead to different answers.

Who May Find This Useful

Members of the Physics Forums community interested in word games, cryptic puzzles, and username trivia may find this discussion engaging.

  • #121
jimmysnyder said:
Not bad, but not what I had in mind either. Describe Godel's approach.

I was thinking, since I was the 'first' after Gokul's----webster 'def.'=tailor, and Gokul in a burg in India, but Gokul's answer is an amazing one.

Gokul43201 said:
Who me? :biggrin:

YES!---Actually all three were as a tribute/homage to your hard work! (the whip=cool whip!-esp here at the holiday season)--I almost put 'Don't stop the pi whipping'


Here's another one to solve (easy, I think):


woh, wehn, wehre, ...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #122
jimmysnyder said:
Describe Godel's approach.
Approach for what? Proving the incompleteness theorems? I've thought this out and tried it on myself at various levels of detail, to no avail. :(

The best I could do was think that mapping logical elements onto numbers was sort of the same process as mapping meanings onto words, which is what a dictionary (even say, Webster's dictionary) does.

rewebster said:
woh, wehn, wehre, ...
Hmmmm...that's a toughie, so I'll make some blind guesses: Is it wihch or wyh? :wink:
 
  • #123
Gokul43201 said:
I'm not seeing the Godel connection ...

Jimmy used self-reference.

Amazing thread!

Thanks, Gokul.
 
  • #124
George Jones said:
Jimmy used self-reference.
Ahhh, Herr Schneider! Ich bin dumm!

Amazing thread!

Thanks, Gokul.
You're most welcome! Glad y'all had fun too - I didn't want to be the only one in the party!

Rewebster: Thanks for the tri-bute!
 
  • #125
Gokul43201 said:
Ahhh, Herr Schneider! Ich bin dumm!

sq rt -1, sq rt 4!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K