SpaceX What's Next for SpaceX and Space Exploration in 2018?
Click For Summary
In 2018, SpaceX successfully launched the Falcon Heavy rocket, carrying Elon Musk's Tesla Roadster into space, marking a significant milestone in space exploration. The launch showcased advanced technology, including the simultaneous landing of two side boosters, although the core booster failed to land successfully. The BepiColombo mission, a collaboration between European and Japanese space agencies, is set to launch towards Mercury, with a lengthy journey expected to take until 2025 to reach its destination. Discussions also highlighted the emergence of smaller rockets like Electron and SS-520, which are targeting the small satellite market. Overall, 2018 is poised to be a pivotal year for space exploration with numerous ambitious missions and technological advancements.
Physics news on Phys.org
Borg
Science Advisor
Gold Member
- 2,283
- 4,982
I wonder when the BFR will have its first launch. I might have to take a vacation to Florida for that one.Greg Bernhardt said:It's on my bucket list to see a launch like that!
- 37,387
- 14,216
In the press conference Musk indicated that first hops could happen in 2019. That will probably mean 2020-2021. It is still unclear where - the new site in Texas and drone ships are both interesting options.Borg said:I wonder when the BFR will have its first launch. I might have to take a vacation to Florida for that one.
Flights of the full rocket will come later.
- 11,326
- 8,751
mfb said:Caveat: It is common that launches get delayed.
It's a terrible situation. The KSC Visistor's Center sells tickets for a close-up view of a launch for $200/person. But once the bus leaves the Visitors Center, no refunds are given even if the launch is canceled or delayed. I think that is predatory.
Too bad, I sold my boat. In the past I was able to sail my boat as close to the launch pad as anyone gets and anchor free of charge. For night launches especially, that was dramatic. I could have offered @Greg Bernhardt a front row seat for free, but alas no longer.
- 19,808
- 10,760
Wow I had no idea there were so many launches. Seems the whole world uses the pad!mfb said:List of all launches
The Falcon 9 seems like a nice size rocket. Maybe I could swing a trip for March 20th to see TESS take off.
Borg
Science Advisor
Gold Member
- 2,283
- 4,982
Has anyone heard what the status of the live feed is? I have heard that the batteries ran out on the Tesla and what we're seeing now is just old footage even though the feed says otherwise. Also AFAIK, there isn't a large antenna so its signal would get harder to pick up as it gets farther from us. Eventually we will lose contact but has it happened already?
Makes me wonder how people will follow this over the years. Will the first Mars missions will pass within visual distance of the Tesla someday? Will Hubble take pictures of it occasionally? I also can't imagine that someone wouldn't retrieve it in the distant future and put it in a museum.
Makes me wonder how people will follow this over the years. Will the first Mars missions will pass within visual distance of the Tesla someday? Will Hubble take pictures of it occasionally? I also can't imagine that someone wouldn't retrieve it in the distant future and put it in a museum.
Last edited:
- 11,326
- 8,751
I just saw a picture on the news that claims to be the "last" picture from the car.Borg said:Has anyone heard what the status of the live feed is?
- 37,387
- 14,216
For the FH launch, they offered free re-admittance if the launch gets shifted.anorlunda said:The KSC Visistor's Center sells tickets for a close-up view of a launch for $200/person. But once the bus leaves the Visitors Center, no refunds are given even if the launch is canceled or delayed. I think that is predatory.
The second link is the list of launches of the whole world.Greg Bernhardt said:Wow I had no idea there were so many launches. Seems the whole world uses the pad!
Or did you expect Chinese rockets to launch from Florida? ;)
The car should be visible to good telescopes for quite some time, if (!) someone tracks it we get a nice orbit determination. The car should be bright enough to observe it frequently for the largest telescopes, but time for that is probably very limited.
- 19,808
- 10,760
Good point, I see that now :)mfb said:The second link is the list of launches of the whole world.
Or did you expect Chinese rockets to launch from Florida? ;)
Vatsal Goyal
- 51
- 6
Spinnor said:"Now when alien life forms come to the solar system they'll find a red land going vehicle orbiting a lifeless planet being driven by a plastic astronaut. If that doesn't cause them to have a massive WTF moment then nothing will."
On the circuit its written, "Made on Earth by 'humans'". It's so hilarious.
- 11,326
- 8,751
Vatsal Goyal said:On the circuit its written, "Made on Earth by 'humans'". It's so hilarious.
What a wonderful sense of humor they have.
Did you see the sign that said Don't Panic? I think it could have said "...rerouting..."
- 37,387
- 14,216
Still a busy year there.Greg Bernhardt said:Good point, I see that now :)
~15-20 SpaceX flights (they want to launch 30 rockets in 2018, 3 done already, a few will launch from California)
7 Atlas flights
2 Delta IV flights
Some Falcon launches have returning boosters.
For the launch of Paz on February 17 the rocket has the performance, but SpaceX has no use for that booster any more - they might use it for tests over the ocean.
The booster for TESS, March 20: Would surprise me. The satellite is light but high Earth orbit needs a high performance of the rocket.
SpaceX CRS-14 (ISS resupply), April 2: That one will probably come back. It has flown before already, and it is a good candidate for a third flight.
SpaceX CRS-15, June 9: The booster will come back.
SpX-DM1 (Crew Dragon demo mission, without crew), not before August: The booster will come back.
SpaceX CRS-16, November 16: The booster will come back.
SpX-DM2 (Crew Dragon with Crew), likely to get shifted to 2019: The booster will come back.
All other launches won't have the booster return to launch site, or don't have a scheduled launch date yet.
There might be two Falcon Heavy flights this year, in both cases it is likely that both side boosters return.
- 19,808
- 10,760
I'll be gunning for one of these!mfb said:There might be two Falcon Heavy flights this year, in both cases it is likely that both side boosters return.
Borg
Science Advisor
Gold Member
- 2,283
- 4,982
OmCheeto
Gold Member
- 2,482
- 3,404
mfb said:...
The car should be visible to good telescopes for quite some time, if (!) someone tracks it we get a nice orbit determination. The car should be bright enough to observe it frequently for the largest telescopes, but time for that is probably very limited.
I found this on Twitter @ #FalconHeavy:
https://twitter.com/vacant3rdman/status/961633262207565824
Image credit: Anthony Horton, Sydney, Australia
Also found this, via Anthony: https://ssd.jpl.nasa.gov/horizons.cgi
Unfortunately, so far; "This trajectory is a ballistic propagation derived from a post-injection state provided by SpaceX on 2018-Feb-7, and is based on internal GPS data."
So the "Ephemeris" data, whatever that means, is no better than what we already have. [?]
ps. Thank you, @tony873004 for wasting several more hours of my time last night, playing with your gosh darned simulator!
Yesterdays simulator's prediction [ref]
Todays simulator's prediction [ref]
Attachments
mheslep
Gold Member
- 362
- 719
Double the payload and a quarter the cost of Delta IV ($400M Delta IV per wiki vs $90M FH per Musk).mfb said:Its payload, up to 63,800 kg, is more than twice the payload of the most powerful rocket in operation, the Delta IV Heavy
TurtleMeister
- 897
- 90
The return and safe landing of the side boosters was fascinating. This video shows how fast they're coming down before the rockets fire. Best if you use full screen with headphones.
- 37,387
- 14,216
$90M is the price for the reusable configuration, the same way the maiden flight launched. For that, the payload is expected to be somewhere between 30 and 40 tonnes. Falcon Heavy can launch 63 tonnes to LEO, but then it has to fly expendable and SpaceX will charge more.mheslep said:Double the payload and a quarter the cost of Delta IV ($400M Delta IV per wiki vs $90M FH per Musk).
berkeman
Admin
- 69,214
- 24,334
TurtleMeister said:The return and safe landing of the side boosters was fascinating. This video shows how fast they're coming down before the rockets fire. Best if you use full screen with headphones.

Last edited:
- 37,387
- 14,216
Technically each booster produces three sonic booms, but two are so close together that you don't properly hear that. What is the issue?berkeman said:Fun video. Unfortunate that the narrator has a kindergarten education in sonic booms, but whatever. Maybe we can edit out his commentary?![]()
berkeman
Admin
- 69,214
- 24,334
mfb said:Technically each booster produces three sonic booms, but two are so close together that you don't properly hear that. What is the issue?
Last edited:
berkeman
Admin
- 69,214
- 24,334
Huh, I might be wrong about that coincidence:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencet...X-Falcon-Heavy-boosters-fire-sonic-booms.html
I need to think more about why the two sounds would be coincident. Coincidence? Weird. Sorry that I mistrusted you, @mfb
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencet...X-Falcon-Heavy-boosters-fire-sonic-booms.html
I need to think more about why the two sounds would be coincident. Coincidence? Weird. Sorry that I mistrusted you, @mfb
berkeman
Admin
- 69,214
- 24,334
Yeah, now it looks like the sonic booms were delayed by about 5 seconds (a little over a mile), and the boosters fired at about the closest approach to the listener. So it's probably a valid video and commentary. I will deprecate my "kindergarten" comment...
- 37,387
- 14,216
Here is a webcast with booster telemetry
The boosters become subsonic at about 7 km altitude, the landing burn starts at 3 km altitude and ~3/4 the speed of sound. The flight profile for the FH boosters should have been very similar. The sonic booms come from quite far away. They are a bit faster than the rocket, but not much.
The boosters become subsonic at about 7 km altitude, the landing burn starts at 3 km altitude and ~3/4 the speed of sound. The flight profile for the FH boosters should have been very similar. The sonic booms come from quite far away. They are a bit faster than the rocket, but not much.
- 2,009
- 974
Borg said:I can't help but be reminded of the opening scene of the movie Heavy Metal.
I thought the same exact thing. They even put a "dummy astronaut" in the driver's seat.
I've heard that it is an awesome experience to witness firsthand. One day I'd like to travel to Florida to witness a launch.
- 3,479
- 1,287
mheslep said:Double the payload and a quarter the cost of Delta IV ($400M Delta IV per wiki vs $90M FH per Musk).
Cue the CEO of Orbital ATK releasing a statement about how SpaceX is still just a bit player who doesn't threaten their business.
OmCheeto
Gold Member
- 2,482
- 3,404
Where is it now(ish)?
[new reference]
Q: What would it looks like to Hubble?
A: A point: 0.025 pixels
[ref: maths]
[new reference]
Q: What would it looks like to Hubble?
A: A point: 0.025 pixels
[ref: maths]
Attachments
Stavros Kiri
- 1,118
- 962
History in the making!
Unfortunately I didn't get the chance to watch the events live when they happened, but I am catching up now ...
Unfortunately I didn't get the chance to watch the events live when they happened, but I am catching up now ...
OmCheeto
Gold Member
- 2,482
- 3,404
And the vehicle now has its own wiki page: Elon Musk's Tesla Roadster
I was thumbing through Twitter this afternoon when I ran across a re-tweet by Brian Cox:
I was thumbing through Twitter this afternoon when I ran across a re-tweet by Brian Cox:
JJ Hermes @jotajotahermes
Early this morning we measured the brightness changes of a car tumbling in space!
Credit to Erik Dennihy (@UNC), we can report that Tesla Roadster (Starman, 2018-017A) is rotating with a period of 4.7589 +/- 0.0060 minutes.
Credit to Erik Dennihy (@UNC), we can report that Tesla Roadster (Starman, 2018-017A) is rotating with a period of 4.7589 +/- 0.0060 minutes.
Attachments
Tom.G
Science Advisor
Gold Member
- 5,661
- 4,504
Video, continuous from launch thru booster recovery. About 9 minutes. Taken thru an 8 inch telescope so you can see the booster separation and the return-to-launch burns.
nsaspook
Science Advisor
- 1,494
- 4,997
Failed booster return and near miss at 1:10
Borg
Science Advisor
Gold Member
- 2,283
- 4,982
Hard to believe that it's been 2 1/2 years already. I've been curious lately about where the Starman roadster is currently and it's going to have a close approach to Mars on Oct. 7th.
gleem
Science Advisor
Education Advisor
- 2,704
- 2,182
The United States Space Force has announced the launch date for its 2-year delayed USSF-44 mission, Oct 28.
https://www.teslarati.com/spacex-falcon-heavy-rocket-first-launch-three-years-take-two/
https://www.teslarati.com/spacex-falcon-heavy-rocket-first-launch-three-years-take-two/
- 11,326
- 8,751
Three nearly simultaneous landings. I love it.
- 37,387
- 14,216
Just two (controlled) landings. The center booster was expended. It's possible SpaceX collected some data from that before its destruction - the highest re-entry speed a Falcon booster has ever achieved by a large margin.
Similar threads
- Replies
- 3
- Views
- 3K
- Replies
- 3
- Views
- 4K
- Replies
- 2
- Views
- 9K
- Replies
- 22
- Views
- 3K
- Replies
- 1
- Views
- 3K
