Whats normal force at top/bottom of loop

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a mass sliding along a looped track, focusing on the forces acting on the mass at the top and bottom of the loop. The key questions include determining the minimum release height for the mass to remain on the track and calculating the normal forces at both the top and bottom of the loop based on different release heights.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss energy conservation principles and the relationship between potential and kinetic energy. There are questions about the dependence of the normal force on height and the implications of the calculated release height.

Discussion Status

Some participants are exploring the calculations related to the normal force and questioning the assumptions made regarding the height. There is an acknowledgment of a mistake in the reasoning, leading to a productive re-evaluation of the problem.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of a homework assignment, which may impose specific requirements on the solution approach and the interpretation of the problem.

bfusco
Messages
126
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


The small mass m sliding without friction along the looped track shown in the figure is to remain on the track at all times, even at the very top of the loop of radius r.

http://session.masteringphysics.com/problemAsset/1057653/6/GIANCOLI.ch08.p090.jpg

A)In terms of the given quantities, determine the minimum release height h.
B)If the actual release height is 3h, calculate the normal force exerted by the track at the bottom of the loop.
C)f the actual release height is 3h, calculate the normal force exerted by the track at the top of the loop.

The Attempt at a Solution


A)i was easily able to solve part A, i got 2.5r
B)for this i started with energy conservation. i have that the potential energy at the beginning is equal to the kinetic energy at the bottom (3mgh=1/2mv^2, the potential energy being 3mgh because the starting height is 3h). i calculated the velocity to b v^2=6gh, which i then plugged into my centripetal force equation (ƩF=mv^2/r). N-mg=6mgh+mg, solving for N i get N=mg(6h+1/r), which is incorrect, I am instructed that the answer does not depend on height.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
welcome to pf!

hi bfusco! welcome to pf! :smile:
bfusco said:
i get N=mg(6h+1/r), which is incorrect, I am instructed that the answer does not depend on height.

how did that h survive? :confused:

i thought you found what h was?​
 


tiny-tim said:
hi bfusco! welcome to pf! :smile:


how did that h survive? :confused:

i thought you found what h was?​

thank you tiny tim,

hm...you make a good point i guess that's what happens when you stare at a board for hours, you miss the little things. lol I am going to give that a try.
 
hahahahaha it worked...i feel stupid right now. thank you for your help tiny tim
 

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
7K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K