What's the best way to destroy pathogens on plastic?

  • Thread starter Thread starter wannab
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Plastic
AI Thread Summary
Reusing plastic bottles raises hygiene concerns due to potential bacterial buildup and the risk of chemical leaching from the plastic. The original label warnings often indicate that manufacturers are not liable for health issues arising from reuse. The safety of reusing a bottle largely depends on its material, previous contents, and storage conditions. BPA, a common concern, can leach from plastics, especially under certain temperatures, but the extent of this risk is often overstated. Experts recommend disposing of bottles responsibly rather than attempting to sanitize them for long-term use. For those seeking alternatives to bottled water, using a water filtration system, like a zero water pitcher, is suggested for better quality and safety.
wannab
Messages
32
Reaction score
1
I've got a plastic bottle that I want to reuse for years, but the label said that you shouldn't reuse it for hygiene reasons. I'm assuming some bacteria builds up or something and this is dangerous?

If so, what is the best way to kill these microorganisms without wearing down the plastic?
 
Biology news on Phys.org
wannab said:
I've got a plastic bottle that I want to reuse for years, but the label said that you shouldn't reuse it for hygiene reasons. I'm assuming some bacteria builds up or something and this is dangerous?
Or, possibly, the plastic contains volatile materials that come out over a long time, and these are poisonous? Maybe the contents diffuses into the plastic slightly so that some may remain after the product is used - posing a health risk?

If so, what is the best way to kill these microorganisms without wearing down the plastic?
Depends on the organism and the plastic. You will need to supply more information - is the type of plastic written on the bottle? What was the bottle originally for? Otherwise any answer you get will be a guess.
 
I don't know what you want to store in these bottles but over here it is recommended not to reuse water bottles because of leaching.
 
There have been some cautious notes about BPA-based plastics leaching - mostly over-hyped.
http://lifehacker.com/5909676/stop-...es-theyre-not-leeching-poison-into-your-water

The warning usually means that if you reuse a bottle, and you get sick as a result, then it is not the manufacturer's fault: you were warned. The label actually specifying "hygiene reasons" seems odd though.

Without knowing the details of what the bottle is made of, what it originally contained, how it has been stored, the best advise is to dispose of the bottle in an ecologically sensitive manner ;)
 
Simon Bridge said:
You will need to supply more information.

Yes, I think as Bridge says, the real 1000 pound gorilla in the room is why on Earth would you want to continue to use some old plastic bottle? Likely for some sentimental reason, but without more specifics you're not likely you get the real information you need.

BPA's the media darling of recent anti-plastic reuse. That's going to be an issue even though its dependent on temperature, but you can't consistently control for that. Personally, I'm guessing it's a bottle that Gene Simmons or someone drank out off at a Kiss concert you went to or something. My advice is not to seek it here but to go to a professional who can treat the bottle some way for long term use. I wouldn't try doing it yourself with some anti-plastic pathogen cleaning regimen.

Btw, I used to be a big bottled water fan but for reasons I'm too tired to type (and I put some time into doing the research), my final conclusion was the that the best and most economical way to drink the best water possible is a zero water pitcher.
 
Use a bleach solution.
Google: dental bacteria bleach
for concentration info
:)
 
Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S. According to articles in the Los Angeles Times, "Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S.", and "Kissing bugs bring deadly disease to California". LA Times requires a subscription. Related article -...
I am reading Nicholas Wade's book A Troublesome Inheritance. Please let's not make this thread a critique about the merits or demerits of the book. This thread is my attempt to understanding the evidence that Natural Selection in the human genome was recent and regional. On Page 103 of A Troublesome Inheritance, Wade writes the following: "The regional nature of selection was first made evident in a genomewide scan undertaken by Jonathan Pritchard, a population geneticist at the...

Similar threads

Back
Top