What's the Difference Between Quantum and Simple Harmonic Oscillators?

Thierry12
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
Can someone tell me if there is a difference in the moving motion between a quantum harmonic oscillator and a simple harmoic oscillator. Also, does anoyone know a good site where i could learn more on quantum harmonic oscillator.

ty
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you mean, how does the particle "actually move" in a quantum harmonic oscillator, the answer is the same as for an electron in a hydrogen atom, etc. QM gives us the probabilities for finding the particle at various locations (or the values of other physical quantities such as energy, momentum, etc.) when we observe/measure it, but it does not tell us what it is "actually doing" before we observe/measure it.

This is the subject of interpretations of QM (Copenhagen, Bohmian, many-worlds, etc.). They all make (so far) the same predictions for the probabilities that we can actually observe/measure, so there is no way (as yet) to distinguish between them experimentally. People argue endlessly about which interpretation is best, based mainly on personal philosophical and metaphysical preferences, on this forum and elsewhere.
 
ty !
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top