- #1

- 68

- 2

My teacher said this IVP couldn't be expressed in terms of functions we commonly know. I was wondering what the general solution is?

Thank-you

You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

- Thread starter logan3
- Start date

- #1

- 68

- 2

My teacher said this IVP couldn't be expressed in terms of functions we commonly know. I was wondering what the general solution is?

Thank-you

- #2

- 1,007

- 76

For solving this

My teacher said this IVP couldn't be expressed in terms of functions we commonly know. I was wondering what the general solution is?

Thank-you

It is a bernoulli form

Watch this video and you will get it how to solve

- #3

- 9,559

- 770

- #4

- 1,007

- 76

I don't know how it solved that.

Share: