- #1
adam15229
- 3
- 0
Suppose that you had trespassed into the bear sanctuary and were attacked by a bear. Should the rangers shoot the bear or let it eat you?
Resolve the Bear Sanctuary Dilemma: Shoot or Be Eaten? Expert Advice
- Thread starter adam15229
- Start date
Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around the ethical dilemma of whether rangers should shoot a bear that attacks a trespasser in a sanctuary. The circumstances of the trespass—whether accidental or intentional—are crucial in determining the appropriate response. If the trespasser is innocent, the sanctuary could be liable, suggesting that shooting the bear might be necessary to prevent further injury. Conversely, if the trespasser is a poacher, the bear's actions could be seen as instinctual defense, potentially justifying its survival. Ultimately, the decision hinges on applicable laws and the moral consideration of human life versus animal rights.
- #2
berkeman
Admin
- 69,305
- 24,544
Trespassed on purpose or by accident?
- #3
adam15229
- 3
- 0
hmmmmm. good question, but the book doesn't say. would you have a different answer for each circumstance?
- #4
Moonbear
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
- 11,919
- 55
adam15229 said:
This sounds like it might be a homework question? It also sounds like more of an ethics question than a biology question.
- #5
adam15229
- 3
- 0
yeah, its an extra credit question and he said there is a right and wrong answer.
- #6
berkeman
Admin
- 69,305
- 24,544
Without more info, I don't think you can say there is a right and a wrong answer. For example, if they trespassed totally by accident and were blind-sided by the bear for no particular reason, then the sanctuary and rangers would probably be liable for the damages of the attack, and the rangers would be smart to shoot the bear before it could inflict much injury.
On the other hand, if the tresspassers were poachers, were sneaking up on a baby cub to shoot it or something, and mama bear surprised the poacher and reacted instinctively to protect her young, then I doubt that the rangers would be required to shoot the bear that they are there to protect.
The "right" answer would probably come down to a matter of the applicable laws. Try researching the laws regarding game sanctuaries (in the country where you are -- they probably are different in Africa versus Canada versus the US), and see if there are some clues there.
On the other hand, if the tresspassers were poachers, were sneaking up on a baby cub to shoot it or something, and mama bear surprised the poacher and reacted instinctively to protect her young, then I doubt that the rangers would be required to shoot the bear that they are there to protect.
The "right" answer would probably come down to a matter of the applicable laws. Try researching the laws regarding game sanctuaries (in the country where you are -- they probably are different in Africa versus Canada versus the US), and see if there are some clues there.
- #7
vanesch
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
- 5,102
- 20
I surely would say that there is a right answer: shoot the bear!
No matter what considerations, a human life is always worth more than an animal. At least from a human viewpoint
No matter what considerations, a human life is always worth more than an animal. At least from a human viewpoint