Embedded Journalists - AP Reporter Shooting Rehash

  • Context: News 
  • Thread starter Thread starter russ_watters
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ap
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the shooting incident involving AP reporters embedded with insurgents during the Iraq War, focusing on the perceived double-standard in accountability between the US military and insurgent forces. Participants explore the implications of embedded journalism in conflict zones, the responsibilities of journalists, and the broader context of military engagement and civilian casualties.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Meta-discussion

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants argue that the responsibility for the deaths of the AP reporters lies with their choice to embed with insurgents, framing it as an occupational hazard.
  • Others suggest that the US military's mistaken identification of the reporters' cameras as weapons complicates the moral and tactical evaluation of the incident.
  • There is a contention that the US is held to a higher standard than insurgents, which some view as reasonable given the military's resources and capabilities.
  • Participants discuss the implications of public opinion and legal accountability, noting that the perception of the US military's actions does not always align with the legal standards applied to combat situations.
  • Some express concern over the lack of outrage directed at insurgents for the deaths of embedded journalists, suggesting a bias in the discourse surrounding military accountability.
  • The role of national pride and the demographic composition of the forum participants is mentioned as a factor influencing perspectives on the issue.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the appropriateness of holding the US to a higher standard compared to insurgents. While some agree that such a standard is justified, others question the fairness of this expectation. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the implications of these differing standards and the responsibilities of embedded journalists.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the complexities of analyzing the incident through different lenses, including public opinion and legal frameworks, which may lead to conflicting interpretations of accountability and responsibility.

  • #61
Cyrus said:
How you can you sit there and complain about 'not having any say' in the war, when you can directly vote these people out of office - gimme a break. If the majority of people don't vote but only complain, they really ought to just keep their opinions to themselves... The US is not a direct democracy.
Well, I can't directly vote anyone out of office. But if people stop voting for Republicans and Democrats, then maybe we'll get some positive changes in this country. The problem is, everybody is fairly comfortable. Precious few people actually take their civic responsibilities seriously. We've been, collectively, lulled to sleep. The congress is free to pursue this war or that war. Nobody gives a s**t. Is this really the sort of situation that you would call a 'democracy'. Are you really proud of a country where fully 50% of those who are eligible to vote don't even bother to? Personally, it makes me sick. The US will get what it deserves, which is third world status by 2100. This is our destiny. It's what not giving a s**t gets you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #62
Gokul43201 said:
I wouldn't go so far.

It was the huge support among the electorate[1] for a war in Iraq that, IMO, made it all possible. I don't think, for instance, that the Dems would have caved and signed on to the Iraq War Resolution bill if they hadn't calculated that objecting would make them look wimpy to a constituency that was still demanding revenge[2] for 9/11. If there had not been a 9/11, it would have been a whole lot harder for the Bush admin to sell the idea of the necessity of war in Iraq to the people, and hence to Congress. It would also have been much harder to enlist recruits[3].

1. 72% of public support war in Iraq (March 2003) - Pew Research
2. Poll shows 69% of public believe Saddam personally involved in 9/11 attack - Washington Post
3. 90% or troops serving in Iraq think war is retaliation for Saddam's role in 9/11 - Zogby
As I said in my previous post, citizens of the US do not take their civic responsibilities seriously. They do not dig to find the truth. They are satisfied to be manipulated by advertising and propaganda. They are comfortable. They don't give a s**t. Hence, they are pawns of the 'elected' elite.

The remedy -- as I've said, stop voting for Republicans and Democrats. If there isn't any other party on your ballot, then write somebody in. That's what I do. It isn't difficult.
 
  • #63
ThomasT said:
Well, I can't directly vote anyone out of office. But if people stop voting for Republicans and Democrats, then maybe we'll get some positive changes in this country. The problem is, everybody is fairly comfortable. Precious few people actually take their civic responsibilities seriously. We've been, collectively, lulled to sleep. The congress is free to pursue this war or that war. Nobody gives a s**t. Is this really the sort of situation that you would call a 'democracy'. Are you really proud of a country where fully 50% of those who are eligible to vote don't even bother to? Personally, it makes me sick. The US will get what it deserves, which is third world status by 2100. This is our destiny. It's what not giving a s**t gets you.

Where do you get this third world status by 2100 claim from?

Note: I don't disagree with you on the people not caring but we can directly measure that by the number of people that actually go to the polls. Historically, it isn't any more or less now than it has been in the past, so your assertion that we are going down because of a lack of voter turnout has no basis. If what you said were true, the US would have been on the decline since the 1960s.

http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0781453.html
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • Poll Poll
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
Replies
97
Views
17K
  • · Replies 91 ·
4
Replies
91
Views
9K
Replies
35
Views
11K
  • · Replies 57 ·
2
Replies
57
Views
9K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 54 ·
2
Replies
54
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K