What's the underlying frame of the Einstein's Field Equation?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the coordinate systems used to set up and solve the Einstein's Field Equations (EFE) in General Relativity (GR). It is established that the EFE can be solved in any coordinate system, including Lorentzian and curvilinear frames. The ADM formalism is recommended for solving the EFE in extended spacetime regions, such as the solar system, and it is crucial to impose appropriate boundary conditions. The conversation also clarifies misconceptions about the metric tensor, emphasizing that it is essential for describing the geometry of spacetime and that solutions like Schwarzschild and Kerr are valid vacuum solutions, not necessarily implying the presence of mass.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of General Relativity (GR) principles
  • Familiarity with Einstein's Field Equations (EFE)
  • Knowledge of the ADM formalism for initial-value problems
  • Basic concepts of metric tensors and their role in spacetime geometry
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the ADM formalism for solving Einstein's Field Equations
  • Study the properties and applications of Schwarzschild and Kerr solutions
  • Explore the concept of geodesics in curved spacetime
  • Investigate the implications of gauge theory in General Relativity
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, mathematicians, and students of theoretical physics who are interested in the mathematical foundations of General Relativity and the practical applications of Einstein's Field Equations in cosmology and astrophysics.

  • #181
Orodruin said:
What would be measured by a radar measurement’s round trip time (multiplied by c/2) would be
$$
\int \sqrt{-\frac{g_{rr}}{g_{tt}}} dr = \int g_{rr} dr.
$$
Did you get that formula from the metric ## ds^2 = g_{tt}\, (c\,dt)^2 - g_{rr}\,dr^2##, by setting ##ds^2 = 0## for the light-like path?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #182
Pyter said:
Did you get that formula from the metric ## ds^2 = g_{tt}\, (c\,dt)^2 - g_{rr}\,dr^2##, by setting ##ds^2 = 0## for the light-like path?
Yes. What you want is to integrate dt to obtain the global time difference.

Note: It is ##ds^2 = g_{tt} dt^2 + g_{rr} dr^2##. The signs are included in the metric components.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Pyter
  • #183
Orodruin said:
Note: It is ##ds^2 = g_{tt} dt^2 + g_{rr} dr^2##. The signs are included in the metric components.
Right. But not ##c^2##, I guess? Otherwise either the RHS of the line element is not dimensionally correct, or ##g_{tt}## has a dimension different from ##g_{rr}##.
 
  • #184
Pyter said:
Right. But not ##c^2##, I guess? Otherwise either the RHS of the line element is not dimensionally correct, or ##g_{tt}## has a dimension different from ##g_{rr}##.
I always use units with ##c = 1##. It is just more ... natural.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71
  • #185
Orodruin said:
Yes. What you want is to integrate dt to obtain the global time difference.

Note: It is ##ds^2 = g_{tt} dt^2 + g_{rr} dr^2##. The signs are included in the metric components.
So for the round-trip coordinate time ##\Delta t## of the complete null path ##ds=0## from the spaceship hovering at fixed ##(\theta, \phi, r_1)## to the star surface at ##(\theta, \phi, r_0)## and back we get the value of that integral multiplied by 2.
 
  • #186
Yes
 
  • #187
Orodruin said:
I always use units with ##c = 1##. It is just more ... natural.
Of course, I was talking about MKS units.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 57 ·
2
Replies
57
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
5K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
3K