When do quantum effects become important?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the significance of quantum effects in gravitational calculations, particularly focusing on the length scale at which these effects become relevant.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore scaling arguments involving the gravitational constant, Planck's constant, and the speed of light to determine the relevant length scale for quantum effects. There are attempts to combine these constants to eliminate mass and convert time to length units.

Discussion Status

Some participants are actively working through dimensional analysis and expressing uncertainty about their calculations. There is a request for confirmation of the findings, indicating an ongoing exploration of the topic without a definitive conclusion.

Contextual Notes

One participant notes that dimensional analysis is a relatively new concept for them, which may influence their confidence in the calculations presented.

andyfry
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
At what length scale do quantum effects become important in gravitational calculations??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can figure this out from a scaling argument. The gravitational constant, G, has dimensions of (length)3(mass)-1(time)-2 or, in shorthand, L3M-1T-2. The speed of light, c, is the universal conversion between time and distance, since it has units of LT-1.

Finally, quantum effects are characterized by Planck's constant h, or more commonly used \hbar, which has units of L2M T-1. If \hbar were zero, quantum effects would not exist, so in the limit that \hbar \rightarrow 0, the length scale where quantum effects becomes important must also go to zero. So our length scale must depend on \hbar to a positive power.

Can you see how to combine \hbar and G to eliminate the mass scale? How about how to combine powers of c with the result to convert time to length units?
 
Yeah, this was what I was trying to do! Thought i had solved it correctly and was just looking for confirmation. However I've now noticed I got a few dimensions confused. I'll try again...
Multiplying G and \hbar gives dimensions of L5T-3.
c-3 will have dimensions L-3T-3 (I believe?)
So multiplying by this gives dimensions L2
Looking at the indices (10-34*10-11(108)-3) gives a magnitute of 10-69 for L2.
So quantum effects must be taken into account below 1*10-35m!
I hope that was right... :S Dimensional analysis is pretty new to me!
 
Pretty sure this is correct.
Would be great if someone could just confirm please?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
11K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K