When Does a Bouncing Ball Come to Rest?

  • Thread starter Thread starter DeldotB
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ball Time
Click For Summary
A ball dropped from a height bounces with inelastic collisions, where each bounce's velocity is reduced by a constant of restitution, μ. The time taken for the ball to reach the ground after each bounce can be expressed as a series, with the first bounce taking time t1 = 2μv0/g and subsequent bounces following a geometric progression. The discussion highlights the importance of focusing on the time to reach the ground rather than the height of the bounces. The approach to solving the problem involves using the quadratic formula and recognizing the resulting series as geometric. Ultimately, the conversation emphasizes the correct formulation of the summation to find the total time until the ball comes to rest.
DeldotB
Messages
117
Reaction score
8

Homework Statement


Hello!
A ball is dropped and falls to the floor (no horizontal velocity). It hits the floor and bounces with inelastic collisions. The velocity after each bounce is \mu times the velocity of the previous bounce (here \mu is the constant of restitution). The velocity of the first bounce is just v_0. Find the time it takes for the ball to stop bouncing.

Homework Equations


Newtons Laws

The Attempt at a Solution



Well:
I know this will turn into a convergent geometric series. I am just trying to find what that series will look like.

using the formula h=x_0+v_0t+1/2at^2 its easy to see that the time it takes for the ball to reach the ground is:

h=1/2gt^2 so t=\sqrt{2h/g}.
Using energy I also have: mgh=1/2mv_0^2 so gh=1/2v_0^2

Time for the next bounce: well, the ball now has an upward velocity of \mu v_0 and the height of the first bounce is h'=\mu v_0t-1/2gt^2.

I realize this is a simple problem but for some reason I'm not seeing it. If I solve this equation for time, (using quadratic formula) the resulting series for the times t=t_1+t_2+... isn't geometric and actually quite complicated. Is my approach right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi,
You don't want the height of the next bounce, but the time for the ball to reach the ground again. Easier to solve, too!
 
  • Like
Likes PietKuip
I solved the quadratic for the time. Is this not the right approach?
 
Should lead to the same answer - with a lot more work.
What did you use for ##h'## ?
 
BvU said:
Should lead to the same answer - with a lot more work.

Ahh, I see what you mean. So after the first bounce, I have:

Time for ball to reach ground again: 0= \mu v_0 -1/2gt^2 solvig for t yields: 2 \mu v_0/g so

t_1 =2 \mu v_0/g

Time for ball the reach the ground the third time:

t_2= 2 (\mu)^2 v_0/g
and so on. Is this the right direction?
 
And there you have your geometric sequence !
Make sure you have the right summation: the first t is only 'half a bounce'
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
34
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
8K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
8K