When Does Rocket A Receive Rocket B's Signal?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves two rockets, A and B, departing from Earth at constant speeds of 0.6c in opposite directions. After one year in Earth's reference frame, rocket B emits a light signal, and the question is to determine when rocket A receives this signal in various reference frames.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the application of Lorentz transformations and time dilation, with some expressing confusion about the implications of time dilation for both rockets given their opposite directions.

Discussion Status

Some participants have confirmed the calculations for the Earth's reference frame, while others are exploring the implications of time dilation and questioning whether both rockets would perceive the same elapsed time. There is an ongoing examination of how to convert times between different frames.

Contextual Notes

There is a recognition that the problem involves complex relativistic effects, and participants are grappling with the non-intuitive nature of time measurements in different reference frames. The discussion reflects a mix of attempts to clarify assumptions and interpretations of the scenario.

jianxu
Messages
91
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Two Rockets A and B depart from Earth at constant speeds of 0.6c in opposite directions, having synchronized clocks with each other and with Earth at departure. After one year as measured in Earth's reference frame, rocket B emits a light signal(call this event E1). At what times, measured in the reference frames of the Earth and of rockets A and B, does rocket A receive the signal(event E2)

Homework Equations


Lorentz Transformation
kinematics
Time Dilation

signal travels at speed of light

The Attempt at a Solution


So first I just did a simple conversion to get seconds, tearth = 3.15X107s.

Next, I solved for each of the rocket's respective distances at that point with simple kinematics and obtained (-)5.67X1015m.

After this, I drew myself a coordinate system saying the Earth is the origin, rocket B(transmitting signal) in the positive direction, rocket A in the negative direction.

Then I argued that at a time t, the signal and rocket A will be at the same position for the signal to be received and therefore:

position of rocket A = -5.67X1015m- 0.6ct
position of signal = 5.67X1015m - ct

position of rocket A = position of signal

I then solved for t and got 9.45x107s after the signal is sent. I then added this to the original 1 years time and got 1.26x108s.

That was for the Earth's frame.

For the frame of rocket B and A,
I first took the time dilations for them which should be the same since their speeds are the same just in different directions.

for rocket A/B time = tearth*[tex]\gamma[/tex]
where [tex]\gamma[/tex]= 1/([tex]\sqrt{1-(v^2/c^2)}[/tex]

I got 3.94x10^7s for their dilated year

and for their velocities, I got (-)1.875x108m/s after applying velocity addition in relativity

with those information, I solved for the distance as observed by rocket a/b and obtained:
1.48x1016m from each other.

Now for observer b, I used the following kinematics:
position of signal = -ct
position of rocket A = -1.48x1016m - 1.875x108*t

position of signal = position of rocket A

the answer I got when I solved for t was 1.32x108s from the time the signal was sent.

I added that t to the dilated years time and got 1.71x108s total for observer rocket B

Lastly, for rocket A I used the same information. The only difference is thekinematics equation:

speed of signal = 1.48x1016- ct
speed of rocket A= 0

solving for t I got 4.93x107seconds and adding to the dilated year I got

8.87x107s total.

Please check if my thought process/math is right? Thanks! :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your answer about the time at which the signal reaches rocket A in Earth's reference frame looks right to me; after that, i think it gets more complicated than it should:
The factor gamma reduces to 5/4, which is then in a sense the ratio of your values (time and space) between the 2 reference frames; since time is "dilatated" in the rocket, it simply tells you that 4/5 of your 1.26x10^8 seconds have passed in the rockets, which reduces to 1.00x10^8 seconds..
 
Just applying time dilation seems strange to me? It seems unintuitive that rocket B and rocket A will see the same time? Wouldn't the gamma be altered since one of the rocket is going in the positive direction and rocket A is going in the negative direction?
 
Well, rocket A and B surely won't see the same thing: the signal only reaches rocket A.. But their clocks run at the same pace relative to earth, since their speed is the same; now if you know at what time on Earth the signal catches rocket A (which is not the time at which you SEE it catch it from there, of course), you really only need time dilatation to convert into the rockets' reference.. Am I wrong?
 
I think I understand. Part of the inner me wants to reject this because it seems too weird :P So if I apply time dilation, both rockets will measure the 1.00x10^8 when rocket A receives the signal since they both move at the same speed relative to the earth?
 
This is the time that will definitely be seen in rocket A, which is what you are to determine here; for rocket B, you can say that it is the time at which the signal would be seen if it were sent from rocket A in the same conditions.. The thing is: we can't help trying to think in terms of an absolute frame of reference, which doesn't make sense in special relativity!
When the signal reaches A, B is not measuring anything because it will take a few light-years to get any "news" from A..
 
is that why in my first solution the time is so much larger for observer B? the fact that it has to take so much more time to receive the news from A?
 
Yes: if you need to know at what time the signal is SEEN reaching A from Earth and B's reference, you just need to repeat the kinematic calculation you did (and then convert for B the same way as above); the point is: with this kind of problem, from the "fixed" frame of reference (Earth), you can do all the basic calculations you need, and then you really only need time-dilatation to convert; with this, you should be able to give all the answers you need with minimal maths...
 
Ah it's making a bit more sense now :P thanks
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 50 ·
2
Replies
50
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K