When Does the Norm of the Sum Equal the Sum of Norms for Integral Operators?

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter sarrah1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Norm Sum
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the conditions under which the norm of the sum of two linear integral operators equals the sum of their individual norms. Participants explore the implications of specific forms of the operators and the behavior of their norms, focusing on theoretical aspects of functional analysis.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that the equality $||K+M||=||K||+||M||$ occurs "hardly ever," noting that the supremum norm of a sum of two functions is seldom equal to the sum of the supremum norms unless both functions attain their maximum at the same point.
  • Another participant proposes a specific case where both $k(x,t)$ and $m(x,t)$ are represented by series of positive or negative terms, arguing that if they reach their maximum at the endpoint $b$, then $||M||+||K-M||=||K||$ holds true.
  • A participant questions whether the notation $||K||_\infty$ should be used instead of $||K||$ for the norm, suggesting that the norm is a mixed norm involving both supremum and integral norms.
  • It is stated that the triangle inequality $||K+M|| \le ||K|| + ||M||$ is always satisfied as part of the definition of a norm.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the conditions under which the norm of the sum equals the sum of the norms. While some agree on specific cases where this holds, others emphasize the general rarity of such equality. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the broader applicability of these conditions.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the dependence on the specific forms of the integral operators and the conditions under which the norms are evaluated, indicating that the discussion is limited by these assumptions.

sarrah1
Messages
55
Reaction score
0
Hi
I have 2 linear integral operators

$(Ku)(x)=\int_{a}^{b} \,k(x,t)u(t)dt$
$(Mu)(x)=\int_{a}^{b} \,m(x,t)u(t)dt$

I am defining $||K||=max([x\in[a,b]\int_{a}^{b} \,|k(x,t| dt$ same for $L$

when does $||K+M||=||K||+||M||$
thanks
sarrah
 
Physics news on Phys.org
sarrah said:
Hi
I have 2 linear integral operators

$(Ku)(x)=\int_{a}^{b} \,k(x,t)u(t)dt$
$(Mu)(x)=\int_{a}^{b} \,m(x,t)u(t)dt$

I am defining $||K||=max([x\in[a,b]\int_{a}^{b} \,|k(x,t| dt$ same for $L$

when does $||K+M||=||K||+||M||$
thanks
sarrah
I believe that the answer will be "hardly ever". Notice that $\int_{a}^{b}|k(x,t)|\, dt$ and $\int_{a}^{b}|m(x,t)| \,dt$ are both functions (of $x$), and the sup norm of a sum of two functions is very seldom equal to the sum of the sup norms of the functions. In fact, equality only occurs if the two functions attain their maximum at the same point.
 
Opalg said:
I believe that the answer will be "hardly ever". Notice that $\int_{a}^{b}|k(x,t)|\, dt$ and $\int_{a}^{b}|m(x,t)| \,dt$ are both functions (of $x$), and the sup norm of a sum of two functions is very seldom equal to the sum of the sup norms of the functions. In fact, equality only occurs if the two functions attain their maximum at the same point.

Dear Oplag
you are always of great help.
But if a,,b greater than 0 and both k(x,t) and m(x,t) are represented by series of positive terms only or negative terms only, like $k(x,t)=sinhxt$ and $m(x,t)=xt+x^3t^3/3!$ i.e. $m(x,t)$ and $k(x,t)$ reach their maximum at point b then $||M||+||K-M||=||K||. right ?

- - - Updated - - -

Dear Oplag
you are always of great help.
But if a,b greater than 0 and both k(x,t) and m(x,t) are represented by series of positive terms only or negative terms only, like k(x,t)=sinhxt and m(x,t)=xt+x 3 t 3 /3! i.e. m(x,t) and k(x,t) reach their maximum at point b then $||M||+||K-M||=||K||. right ?
 
sarrah said:
But if a,b greater than 0 and both k(x,t) and m(x,t) are represented by series of positive terms only or negative terms only, like k(x,t)=sinhxt and m(x,t)=xt+x 3 t 3 /3! i.e. m(x,t) and k(x,t) reach their maximum at point b then $||M||+||K-M||=||K||. right ?
That is correct. In that case, the functions both attain their maximum at the endpoint $b$, so that is the exceptional situation when the norm of the sum is the sum of the norms.
 
Dear Oplag
final 2 small questions and I wouldn't bother you anymore:

1. When I write $||K||=max ( x\in[a,b])\int_{a}^{b} \,|k(x,t)| dt$ should I write $||K||\infty$ on the L.H.S instead of $||K||$ only

2. For 2 linear integral operators $K$ and $M$ say is $||K+M||\le||K||+||M||$ ? always
thanks
sarrah
 
sarrah said:
1. When I write $||K||=\max ( x\in[a,b])\int_{a}^{b}|k(x,t)|\, dt$ should I write $||K||_\infty$ on the L.H.S instead of $||K||$ only
Personally, I would not put a subscript $\infty$ against that norm. That subscript usually indicates a supremum norm, which in this case would mean the norm $$\|K\|_\infty = \max_{x,t\in[a,b]}|k(x,t)|.$$ But the norm here is a "mixed norm", obtained by using the sup norm for the $x$ variable and the $L^1$-norm (the integral norm) for the $t$ variable.

sarrah said:
2. For 2 linear integral operators $K$ and $M$ say is $||K+M||\le||K||+||M||$ ? always
It is part of the definition of a norm that it should satisfy the triangle inequality $\|A+B\| \leqslant \|A\|+\|B\|$. That certainly applies in the case of this integral norm.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
2K